Carbon sample of a saber tooth tiger decay

  • Thread starter Thread starter graphicer89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carbon Decay
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the age of a saber tooth tiger based on the beta emissions from carbon samples taken from its bone compared to a fresh sample. The subject area includes concepts of radioactive decay and half-life, particularly in the context of carbon dating.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between beta emissions and the concept of half-life in radioactive decay. Some express uncertainty about the starting point for solving the problem, while others suggest reviewing relevant textbook material. There are attempts to relate the decay process to the specific emissions observed in the samples.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided guidance on understanding half-life and the exponential nature of radioactive decay. There is an ongoing exploration of how to calculate the age of the saber tooth tiger based on the emissions, with some participants questioning the calculations and suggesting a step-by-step approach to understanding the decay process.

Contextual Notes

Participants note a lack of initial information or resources, which may hinder their ability to engage fully with the problem. The discussion includes references to specific numerical values, such as the half-life of carbon-14, which is stated to be 5730 years.

graphicer89
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A carbon sample taken from the bone of a saber tooth tiger emits 1 beta emission a minute. A carbon sample of the same size taken from a frest piece of bone emits 16 beta emissions a minute. How long ago did the saber tooth tiger live? How can i do this?


Homework Equations



Are there any equations for this?

The Attempt at a Solution



Well i don't even know where to start honestly...Please at least start me off the right path..
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Radioactive decay occurs exponentially. I imagine you must have some information about it in your notes or something, if you are being asked about it?
 
cepheid said:
Radioactive decay occurs exponentially. I imagine you must have some information about it in your notes or something, if you are being asked about it?

Well honestly I thought so too but no I don't have anything
 
graphicer89 said:
Well honestly I thought so too but no I don't have anything

Try reading up on half-life & radioactive decay in your textbook or on the Internet. After you've done that...

Radioactive decay is a truly random process; no scientist/sage/god/whatever can predict when a given atom will decay. That means that in one second, the number of atoms that decay is proportional only to the amount of radioactive material left. So the ancient tiger tooth in your question contains 1/16 the mass of C-14 in a still-living tiger's tooth. There's a reason that 16 is precisely 2^4...
 
ideasrule said:
Try reading up on half-life & radioactive decay in your textbook or on the Internet. After you've done that...

Radioactive decay is a truly random process; no scientist/sage/god/whatever can predict when a given atom will decay. That means that in one second, the number of atoms that decay is proportional only to the amount of radioactive material left. So the ancient tiger tooth in your question contains 1/16 the mass of C-14 in a still-living tiger's tooth. There's a reason that 16 is precisely 2^4...

Ok so right now i know that half life is 5730 years...and I am trying to figure out the 1/16 the saber tooth lived compared to the recent new one...So i think this is basically a math problem but i have no idea where to start...please help me out..i really want to learn but after reviewing what i was given as a guide..this is all i came up with...
 
What i got was that i multiply...16 x 5730 years...= 91,680 years ago...how does that sound?
 
graphicer89 said:
What i got was that i multiply...16 x 5730 years...= 91,680 years ago...how does that sound?

Not right. Consider the fresh piece of bone that emits 16 betas a minute.

In how many years will it emit 8 betas a minute? Hint: 8 is half of 16.
In how many years will it emit 4 betas a minute?
In how many years will it emit 2 betas a minute?
In how many years will it emit 1 beta a minute?

Note that when the tiger died, all its bones were "fresh."
 
In one half life, the activity decreases to half.
In four half life, the activity decreases to 1/16.
So the age of the tooth is 4xhalf life of carbon.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K