Cardinal Arithmetic: Finite Set X, #X+1

  • Thread starter Thread starter HMPARTICLE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arithmetic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the cardinality of a finite set X, denoted as #X, increases by one when an element x, not in X, is added, resulting in #X U {x} = #X + 1. Participants clarify the definitions of cardinality and bijections, emphasizing that a bijection must be established to demonstrate this property. The proof involves defining a function g that maps elements from X U {x} to the natural numbers, ensuring that g is both one-to-one and onto. The conclusion confirms that the cardinality of the union set is indeed n + 1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite sets and their cardinality.
  • Knowledge of bijections and their properties in set theory.
  • Familiarity with mathematical notation and functions.
  • Basic concepts of natural numbers and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of bijections in more detail, focusing on their role in proving set cardinality.
  • Explore the definitions and properties of finite and infinite sets in set theory.
  • Learn how to construct formal mathematical proofs, particularly in the context of cardinality.
  • Investigate the implications of cardinality in different mathematical contexts, such as in linear algebra.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in set theory and the foundations of mathematics will benefit from this discussion.

  • #31
HMPARTICLE said:
I am setting out to prove that g is onto;
let ## m \in S_{n+1} ##, we must show that there exist ## y \in X \cup \{x\}## such that ## g(y) = m ##.

since ##f## is a bijection between X and ##S_n## there is some ##y \in X ## such that ##f(y) = m##

That is only true if ##m\le n##, not if ##m## happens to be ##n+1##. So state that in your argument.

and if ##m= n+1 ## then ##g(x) = m ## by the definition of g

That is the other case

ALSO by the definition of ##g##, ##y \in X \cup \{x\}## this implies that ##y \in X## or ## y \in \{x\}##, since ##x \in \{x\}## we have ## x,y \in \{x\}## this implies that if ##m = n+1##, then ##g(x) = g(y) = m##.

I guess that is a very confusing way to say the domain of ##g## is ##X\cup \{x\}## and ##g(x) = m+1##. You already said that above "by the definition of g".
Here i have show that there exist ## y \in X \cup \{x\}## such that ## g(y) = m ##

No you haven't. You have shown that if ##m=n+1## that ##g(x)=m##. And you have shown that if ##m\le n## there is a ##y\in X## such that ##\color{red}{f}(y) = m##. YOU HAVE TO SHOW THAT ##\color{red}{g}(y) = m##.
You have to understand, i have run out of ideas. RUN out of ideas.

Perhaps it is time to print out this thread, take it to your teacher, and go over it with him/her in person. That would be a much more efficient use of time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Actually i don't have a teacher/ lecturer, i made the choice to drop out of university to look after a dying grandparent, this resulted in me taking a degree with the open university which does not cover analysis of this kind. so i am self-studying Analysis 1 by terrence tao. When i do come across a problem i have to post it on here. I have NO other choice. I don't have a lecturer to ask.

It's not that I am not applying myself, i spend countless hours on this book.

But thanks for your time
 
  • #33
OK. Then respond to my last post. You have to show ##g(y)=m##. What is ##g(y)## according to its definition?
 
  • #34
for any ##y \in X \cup \{x\}##
we define;
##g(y):= f(y)## for all ## y \in X##,
##g(x):=n+1 ##
 
  • #35
HMPARTICLE said:
for any ##y \in X \cup \{x\}##
we define;
##g(y):= f(y)## for all ## y \in X##,
##g(x):=n+1 ##

So tell me how you know there is a ##y## such that ##g(y)=m##. I know, it's easy. But you have to say why.
 
  • #36
Because y is an element of the set X U {x}
 
  • #37
No. It is because if ##m\le n##, so ##m\in S_n##, you have there is ##y\in X## such that ##f(y)=m## because ##f## is a bijection between ##X## and ##S_n##. And by the definition of g, if ##y\in X## then ##g(y)=f(y)##. That is why ##g(y) = m##.

This should complete the argument that ##g## is onto ##S_{n+1}##. Now, since we have been through it and it isn't really a homework problem because you aren't actually taking a class, I'm going to stretch the PF rules and show you how you should write it up. We have called$$
S_n = \{ i\in N: i\le n\}$$You are given a bijection ##f## from a set ##X## to ##S_n##. If ##x## is not an element of ##x##, you want to demonstrate a bijection ##g## from ##X\cup \{x\}## to ##S_{n+1}##.

Our proposed bijection is$$
g(y)=\left\{\begin{array}{rl}
f(y),& y\in X\\
n+1,& y=x
\end{array}\right.$$
Claim: ##g## is onto ##S_{n+1}##
Proof: Suppose ##m\in S_{n+1}##. If ##m = n+1## then ##g(x) = n+1=m##. If ##m < n+1## then ##m \in S_n## so, since ##f## is a bijection between ##X## and ##S_n##,(hence onto), there is a ##y\in X## such that ##f(y) = m##. Since ##y\in X## then ##g(y) = f(y)## by the definition of ##g##, so ##g(y)=m##.
So in each case, ##m=n+1## or ##m\le n## we have found a ##y## such that ##g(y) = m##.

Now we must show that ##g## is 1-1. You do it. Write down carefully what you have to prove and argue it.
 
Last edited:
  • #38
Thank you ever so much.

The first line
If m = n+1 then g(x) = m+1. I find this a little confusing. if m is some element of ##S_{n+1}## and m = n+1, i get this part... but then to say that g(x) = m+1.
This may sound really stupid, but to me, I'm not quite seeing it.

Claim: ##g## is a 1-1 function
Proof: Let ##m \in S_{n+1} ## and ##y_1, y_2 \in X \cup \{x\} ##. suppose that ##g(y_1) = g(y_2) ##. Then we have two cases to deal with, if ## m < n ## then by the definition of ##g##, ##g(y_1) = g(y_2) ## becomes ##f(y_1) = f(y_2) ##, but ##f## is a bijection, so it follows that ##y_1=y_2##, in the second case, if ## m = n +1 ## then ##g(y_1) = g(y_2)## can only occur if ##y_1 = y_2 = x ##, and##g(x) = m+1##. In either case, g maps different elements to different elements. It follows that ##g## is 1-1
 
Last edited:
  • #39
HMPARTICLE said:
Thank you ever so much.

The first line
If m = n+1 then g(x) = m+1. I find this a little confusing. if m is some element of ##S_{n+1}## and m = n+1, i get this part... but then to say that g(x) = m+1.
This may sound really stupid, but to me, I'm not quite seeing it.

Not stupid and you shouldn't see it. That was just a typo. I fixed it to ##g(x) = n+1##.

Claim: ##g## is a 1-1 function
Proof: Let ##m \in S_{n+1} ## and ##y_1, y_2 \in X \cup \{x\} ##. suppose that ##g(y_1) = g(y_2) \color{red}{=m}##. Then we have two cases to deal with, if ## \color{red}{m < n} ## then by the definition of ##g##, ##g(y_1) = g(y_2) ## becomes ##f(y_1) = f(y_2) ##, but ##f## is a bijection, so it follows that ##y_1=y_2##, in the second case, if ## m = n +1 ## then ##g(y_1) = g(y_2)## can only occur if ##y_1 = y_2 = x ##, and ##g(x) = m+1##. In either case, g maps different elements to different elements. It follows that ##g## is 1-1

Pretty good. You have to say what ##m## is, which I fixed, and is the inequality in red should read ##m\le n##.

Have a nice holiday.
 
  • Like
Likes HMPARTICLE
  • #40
Many thanks again, you also! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K