Casimir effect - Does it fit? Or NOT?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eemaestro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Casimir effect Fit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the Casimir effect, exploring its validity, implications, and relationship to the four fundamental forces of nature. Participants examine whether the effect is real or speculative, its connection to electromagnetic forces and gravity, and its potential applications in technology.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the reality of the Casimir effect, suggesting it may be mere speculation or a misinterpretation of other forces like friction.
  • Others assert that the Casimir effect is real, supported by numerous experiments, and is a consequence of electromagnetic field quantization in specific geometries.
  • A participant references research by Ulf Leonhardt, proposing that the manipulation of the Casimir effect could lead to advancements in reducing friction in nano-machines.
  • Concerns are raised about the accuracy of the information on the Casimir effect, particularly regarding the pressure it generates at small separations, with one participant expressing skepticism about the stated values.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature and implications of the Casimir effect. While some affirm its existence and relevance, others express doubt and challenge the interpretations presented.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the definitions and assumptions related to the forces involved, particularly the relationship between the Casimir effect, electromagnetic forces, and gravity. The discussion also highlights discrepancies in reported values related to the effect.

eemaestro
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I just heard about the Casimir effect:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashmir_effect

Is this for real? Or is it just speculation?
If it's real, then how in the name of science does it fit into the four fundamental forces?!
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/forces/funfor.html

I think it's just a fancy name for friction. I think friction is an example of electromagnetic force, same
as the pressure of standing on the floor. But I could be wrong! The pressure of standing on the floor could be a result of gravity! So which is it? EM or Gravity ? Or both?! We can't even talk about the Casimir effect (if it even exists) until we can clear up something as simple as standing on the floor. :!)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Casimir effect is very real and there have been numerious experiments attesting the existence of that macroscopic force. That's not something new, it can be interesting, but it's a just a mere effect of EM field quantization in various geometries. As for the 4 forces, well they go hand in hand, since the theory of 4 forces is based on (gauge) field quantization which also explains the existence of the Casimir force.
 
Here is page by Ulf Leonhardt explaining how manipulating the Casimir effect may allow advances in the reduction of friction in nano-machines.

http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~ulf/levitation.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the wiki page must be in error, there is no way that this could be true:

Indeed at separations of 10 nm — about a hundred times the typical size of an atom — the Casimir effect produces the equivalent of 1 atmosphere of pressure (101.3 kPa)

1 atm over a separation as large as 100 angstoms? no way
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
870