Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the availability of electronic copies of original Quantum Mechanics papers authored by prominent figures such as Max Planck, Niels Bohr, Albert Einstein, and Louis De Broglie. Participants explore various sources and methods to access these papers, focusing on copyright issues, translations, and repositories.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant inquires about the possibility of accessing original Quantum Mechanics papers in electronic format, suggesting that copyrights may have expired.
- Another participant provides a link to a specific paper and mentions additional resources, although not all are related to Quantum Mechanics.
- A participant clarifies that copyrights for journals have not expired and that many original papers are still under copyright, particularly translations.
- Suggestions are made to use Google with exact references to find legal copies of papers, including adding "pdf" to the search.
- A source is recommended for searching author names to find papers, noting that not all papers are available for free and some may not be translated.
- One participant mentions the Einstein Paper Projects as a free online resource for reading Einstein's papers, though downloads are not permitted.
- A suggestion is made to check university libraries for hard copies of the papers, as well as a book that condenses key papers in Quantum Mechanics.
- Another participant discusses a browser extension that may unlock some papers legally, expressing frustration over the accessibility of scientific research.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the availability and copyright status of original Quantum Mechanics papers. There is no consensus on a single method or source for accessing these papers, and multiple competing views remain regarding the best approach.
Contextual Notes
Participants note limitations regarding the availability of translations, the paywall status of many papers, and the challenges in accessing historical documents. The discussion reflects a broader concern about the accessibility of scientific literature.