Cauchy Mean Value Theorem Proof for Continuous and Integrable Functions

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the Cauchy Mean Value Theorem for continuous and integrable functions. A user seeks assistance with the proof, which states that for continuous function f and integrable function g that is non-negative, there exists a point c in [a,b] satisfying a specific integral equation. Another participant highlights that the original reference provided does not pertain to the same theorem and suggests using the extended mean value theorem to approach the proof. They propose defining functions F and G based on the integrals of f and g, leading to a relationship that can help in proving the theorem. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the mathematical concepts involved rather than just searching for answers online.
iceman
Hi, I really need some help in sovling this proof!

Prove the Cauchy Mean Value Theorem:
If f,g : [a,b]->R satisfy f continuous, g integrable and
g(x)>=0 for all x then there exists element c is a member of set [a,b] so that
int(x=b,a)f(x)g(x)dx=f(c)int(x=b,a)g(x)dx.

Thanks for your help :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi iceman,
imagine I'm a complete ignorant in mathematics. Then I can still type your key words into google, and get for instance this:

http://www.maths.abdn.ac.uk/~igc/tch/ma2001/notes/node42.html



Edit:
Sorry, couldn't help it. But if I was you, I'd ask my prof what's the good in posing problems the answer to which is in the literature. Can't he come up with something more creative?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Arcnets: You also have to be able to UNDERSTAND the results of a google search.
The "Cauchy Mean Value Theorem" your reference gives is clearly NOT the same as the "Cauchy Mean Value Theorem" in the original post. For one thing, the Cauchy Mean Value Theorem the OP asked about is an integral mean value theorem.

(I would use the phrase "extended mean value theorem" for the result given in Arcnet's link.)

Iceman: You can, however, USE the (extended) mean value theorem.

Let F(x)= int(t=a to x) f(t)g(t)dt and let G(x)= int(t= a to x)g(t)dt. Use those in the extended mean value theorem:

(F(b)- F(a))/(G(b)- G(a))= F'(c)/G'(c) for some c in [a,b].

That's not the complete answer- you will still need to do some work.
 
OK,OK. Back to being helpful not provocative.
 
Oh, darn! Provocative is so MUCH more fun!

(And yes, I have complained about doing peoples "google" work for them myself.)
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K