Cauchy Stress Tensor: Equilibrium Equations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ARTjoMS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Notation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Cauchy stress tensor at every material point in a body satisfies the equilibrium equations represented by the formula σ_{ij,j} + F_i = 0. This equation indicates that the divergence of the stress tensor, combined with the body force vector F_i, equals zero, ensuring mechanical equilibrium. The notation ∂/∂y_j σ_{ij}(x,y) represents the j-th coordinate derivative of the stress tensor, where the indices i and j denote the tensor's row and column, respectively. The discussion emphasizes the importance of free indices in verifying the correctness of the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cauchy stress tensor and its application in continuum mechanics
  • Familiarity with equilibrium equations in solid mechanics
  • Knowledge of Einstein summation convention
  • Basic calculus, specifically partial derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Cauchy stress tensor in solid mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of equilibrium equations in structural analysis
  • Explore advanced topics in continuum mechanics, such as the finite element method
  • Investigate applications of the Cauchy stress tensor in material science
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, structural analysts, and students studying continuum mechanics who seek to deepen their understanding of stress analysis and equilibrium conditions in materials.

ARTjoMS
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
''..Cauchy stress tensor in every material point in the body satisfy the equilibrium equations.''

\sigma_{ij,j}+F_i=0

I would appreciate if you could write out what it means.

Also there is this notation which I don't understand:
\frac{\partial}{\partial y_j}\sigma_{ij}(x,y)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first two indices refer to the tensor, (row and column of the matrix) the ",j" then refers to the jth coordinate derivative of the tensor, as is shown in the second notation. From the second notation, I would guess j = 1 -> x and j= 2 -> y. Looks like this is in Einstein summation notation, so since there is a repeated index, j, you need to sum over all values of j. So you'd have (d/dx (sigma_i1) + d/dy (sigma_i2) = -F_i).

One way to check an equation and make sure you are interpreting it right is to look at the free indices. If you move the F to the right side, you have a free index of i on the right, and i and j on the right. So a summation over j will reduce it to a free index of only i on the left, which makes it a proper equation as the free indices have to match up on each side.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K