Cauchy's Theorem & Integral Change of Limits Explained

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bruno67
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of Cauchy's Theorem to justify the change of limits in the integral \(\int_{0}^{-i\infty} \frac{e^{-xu}}{1+iu}du = \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-xu}}{1+iu}du\). The only singularity of the integrand occurs at \(u = i\), allowing the use of a contour integral that avoids this singularity. A quarter-circle contour is proposed, and the challenge lies in proving that the contribution from the circular segment approaches zero as the radius \(R\) tends to infinity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Cauchy's Theorem in complex analysis
  • Contour integration techniques
  • Asymptotic expansions in mathematical analysis
  • Understanding of singularities in complex functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of Cauchy's Theorem in detail
  • Learn about contour integration and residue theorem applications
  • Research asymptotic analysis methods
  • Explore techniques for evaluating contributions of contour segments in integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, physicists, and researchers interested in complex analysis, particularly those studying integral transformations and asymptotic methods.

bruno67
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
A book on which I am studying (Arfken: Mathematical Methods for Physicists), uses the following result in order to derive an asymptotic expansion:

[tex]\int_{0}^{-i\infty} \frac{e^{-xu}}{1+iu}du = \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-xu}}{1+iu}du,[/tex]
where the change of limits in the integral is justified by invoking Cauchy's theorem. I am familiar with Cauchy's theorem, but I am not sure why it justifies this passage. How does it work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only singularity of the denominator is for u = i, so for any path that doesn't go around i, cauchy's theorem gives that the contour integral is zero. Now which path to take? Take a quarter of a circle centered around zero and with radius R; take the quarter that lies in the region where Re(u) > 0 and Im(u) < 0, in other words "at the bottom right". So we have a contour with 3 "sides": a straight line from 0 to R, one on a piece of a circle going from R to -iR and then a line from -iR to 0. If we can prove that the contribution of the circle segment goes to zero for R -> infinity, then we have the statement in your OP.

However, I do not know how to prove that the contribution goes to zero...
 
Thanks for your help. I'll try to prove the remaining part and will post here the results, if it works.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K