Center of Mass for a Bowling Ball

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the center of mass for a bowling ball with three spherical cavities. The problem involves a bowling ball of radius R and uniform density, with the cavities characterized by radius r and positioned equidistantly at a distance d (>2r). Key considerations include the complexity of multiple cavities, spherical symmetry, and the partial nature of the holes. The suggested approach is to simplify the problem by first calculating the center of mass for a single cavity before addressing the full configuration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment of inertia and center of mass calculations
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and symmetry in physics
  • Basic knowledge of calculus and integration techniques
  • Experience with geometric shapes and their properties, particularly spheres and cylinders
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate the center of mass for composite bodies with multiple cavities
  • Study spherical coordinates and their applications in physics problems
  • Explore the concept of moment of inertia for various geometric shapes
  • Investigate the effects of partial volumes on mass distribution in solid objects
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and materials science, as well as anyone involved in the design and analysis of objects with complex geometries.

Yoni V
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone!
I recently worked through finding the moment of inertia of a cylinder with a cylindrical cavity off center, and I wish to further deepen my understanding of calculating the center of mass of such objects. So I made up the following problem:

Homework Statement


Find the center of mass for a bowling ball of radius R and uniform density, with 3 similar holes characterized as follows:
a. Spherical of radius r.
b. Situated such that their centers are equidistant with distance d (>2r).
c. This is a little tricky for me to explain, because English is not my mother tongue: I want the holes to lie partially outside the ball (like a real bowling ball). Slightly more rigorously speaking, if the ball were a circle, the holes would be circles that intersect the "bowling circle" with right angles.
I hope this description is satisfactory.

Homework Equations


Rcm=1/ρVtotal*∑iρVi

The Attempt at a Solution


Inspired by the cylinder problem, I tried to treat this as a full ball minus the cavities, but there are few key differences to consider that make it a whole lot more difficult:
a. There is more than one cavity.
b. The cavities are aligned with a spherical symmetry rather than a cartesian symmetry, which I find harder to make sense of.
c. There is considerable complexity in the fact that the holes are partial spheres. I could approximate the holes to be half spheres, though I'd rather find the exact solution.

A similar approach would be to add another "phantom" spherical shell with zero mass around the ball, tangent to the continuation of the holes, and then subtract the holes entirely, although then we would need again to subtract the partial phantom leftover, which gets us back to the start.

Another line of thought is to reduce the problem to simpler forms and then build up the real thing:
a. A bowling ball with one hole instead of three, to isolate the partial sphere mess from symmetry issues.
b. Reducing it to 2d.

But even then, I'm still stuck on the partial sphere/circle crux.

Thanks!
Yoni
 
Physics news on Phys.org
d>2r? I guess that should be d<2r. And if you don't measure along the curved surface, you even need ##d<\sqrt{3}## (and much smaller for a realistic bowling ball).

Yoni V said:
Inspired by the cylinder problem, I tried to treat this as a full ball minus the cavities
That is certainly a good start.

Yoni V said:
a. There is more than one cavity.
If you can calculate one, the other two are not hard.
Yoni V said:
b. The cavities are aligned with a spherical symmetry rather than a cartesian symmetry, which I find harder to make sense of.
You'll need their position relative to some reference frame (like one centered at the center between the three holes)
Yoni V said:
c. There is considerable complexity in the fact that the holes are partial spheres.
This effect should be very small for realistic holes. To a first approximation the holes are cylinders. A better approximation considers some tilted end of those cylinders. And if you want to consider deviations from this due to curvature, you first have to find out if the mass distribution and the spherical shape are known well enough to reach this precision at all.

I suggest to start with the cylinders (with some "average" end for the sides where they are open).
 

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K