Center of mass prob. with sigma notation, vectors

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 4K views
gn0m0n
Messages
33
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Prove the magnitude R of the position vector [tex]\vec{R}[/tex] for the center of mass from an arbitrary point of origin is given by the equation

M[tex]^{2}[/tex]R[tex]^{2}[/tex] = M[tex]\sum{m_{i}r^{2}_{i}[/tex] - [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex][tex]\sum{m_{i}m_{j}r_{ij}^{2}[/tex]



Homework Equations



[tex]\vec{R}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{1}{M}[/tex] [tex]\sum{m_{i}\vec{r}_{i}[/tex]

M=[tex]\sum{m_{i}[/tex]

[tex]\vec{r}_{ij}[/tex] = [tex]\vec{r}_i[/tex] - [tex]\vec{r}_j[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



OK, the simplest thing to start with is to simply dot [tex]\vec{R}[/tex] with itself to get the magnitude R[tex]^{2}[/tex] and then bring over M[tex]^{2}[/tex] to the LHS. However, I'm not sure how to handle the dotting/squaring with the indices.

Would it be

M[tex]^{2}[/tex]R[tex]^{2}[/tex] = [tex]\sum{m_{i}\vec{r}_{i}[/tex] [tex]\bullet[/tex] [tex]\sum{m_{i}\vec{r}_{i}[/tex]

OR

M[tex]^{2}[/tex]R[tex]^{2}[/tex] = [tex]\sum{m_{i}\vec{r}_{i}[/tex] [tex]\bullet[/tex] [tex]\sum{m_{j}\vec{r}_{j}[/tex] ?

Can I then simplify that by bringing terms out of the summation, or the dot product inside?

My recollection of the summation rules is a bit fuzzy. Actually, I'm not sure I've used the summation notation along with vector operations before.

I've tried writing the squared magnitudes in the desired answer as dot products, too, which allowed me to do a lot of rewriting but I can't connect the givens to the answer yet.

I.e.,
r[tex]^{2}_{i}[/tex] = [tex]\vec{r}_{i}[/tex] [tex]\bullet\vec{r}_{i}[/tex]
r[tex]^{2}_{ij}[/tex] = [tex]\vec{r}_{ij}[/tex] [tex]\bullet\vec{r}_{ij}[/tex] = [tex](\vec{r}_{i}-\vec{r}_{j})[/tex] [tex]\bullet (\vec{r}_{i}-\vec{r}_{j})[/tex] = [tex]\vec{r}_{i}[/tex] [tex]\bullet\vec{r}_{i}[/tex] - 2[tex]\vec{r}_{i}[/tex] [tex]\bullet\vec{r}_{j}[/tex] + [tex]\vec{r}_{j}[/tex] [tex]\bullet\vec{r}_{j}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry that looks kind of rough, I'm no expert at TeX.