Centre of mass frame in nuclear reactions?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the center of mass (CM) frame in nuclear reactions, specifically the reaction a(A,B)b. It highlights the equations for calculating the center of mass velocity, both in non-relativistic and relativistic contexts. The non-relativistic formula, v_c = \frac{\sum m_i v_i}{\sum m_i}, is noted to be an approximation that does not account for massless particles, while the relativistic formula v_c = \frac{\sum m_i \gamma_i v_i}{\sum m_i \gamma_i} incorporates Lorentz factors. The discussion concludes that the CM frame remains consistent before and after a nuclear reaction due to conservation of momentum, despite changes in mass.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear reactions and conservation of momentum
  • Familiarity with non-relativistic and relativistic physics
  • Knowledge of Lorentz transformations and gamma factors
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of relativistic effects in nuclear physics
  • Learn about the role of massless particles in momentum calculations
  • Explore advanced topics in conservation laws during nuclear reactions
  • Investigate the differences between non-relativistic and relativistic kinetic energy calculations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, nuclear engineers, and students studying advanced mechanics or nuclear physics who seek to deepen their understanding of the center of mass frame in nuclear reactions.

AntiElephant
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I'm slightly confused as to how we discuss centre of mass frames in nuclear reactions.

We have the reaction a(A,B)b. Before the reaction we can transfer to the centre of mass frame

v_c = \frac{\sum m_i v_i}{\sum m_i}

and note that the total energy before the reaction is

E_{CM} = E_{masses~before} + E_{kinetic~before~in~CM}

And the total energy after is

E_{CM} = E_{masses~after} + E_{kinetic~after~in~CM}

The problem I'm having to understand is that these two before/after energies are often equated, but the centre of mass frame is not a constant since the masses are not constant in a nuclear reaction, so v_c changes since the denominator \sum m_i changes (numerator remains the same due to conservation of momentum).

Am I wrong here? If I were to guess why we can do this, it's because the change in masses is so small that we can assume the centre of mass frame is constant before/after the reaction. But then this discussion breaks down when we're considering only light particles and the fractional mass change is larger, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Am I wrong here? If I were to guess why we can do this, it's because the change in masses is so small that we can assume the centre of mass frame is constant before/after the reaction. But then this discussion breaks down when we're considering only light particles and the fractional mass change is larger, right?

Momentum is conserved. If you work in a frame where total momentum is zero before the interaction then total momentum will also be zero after the interaction.

The formula:

v_c = \frac{\sum m_i v_i}{\sum m_i}

is a non-relativistic approximation. It will not, in general, correctly tell you the relative velocity of the frame in which total momentum is zero.
 
The relativistic formula for the speed of the center of mass is

v_c = \frac{\sum m_i \gamma_i v_i}{\sum m_i \gamma_i},

where \gamma_i = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v_i^2}{c^2}}}
 
dauto said:
The relativistic formula for the speed of the center of mass is

v_c = \frac{\sum m_i \gamma_i v_i}{\sum m_i \gamma_i},

where \gamma_i = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v_i^2}{c^2}}}

That seems not to account for the possibility of massless particles moving at light speed. May I assume that one would simply divide total momentum by total energy (using units in which c=1) to cover that case?
 
jbriggs444 said:
That seems not to account for the possibility of massless particles moving at light speed. May I assume that one would simply divide total momentum by total energy (using units in which c=1) to cover that case?

Yes.
 
So the frame in which the momentum is zero, is the same before and after a nuclear reaction, because the actual formula takes relativistic mass changes into account?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
980
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K