Centripetal Force and Roller Coasters

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving centripetal force and energy conservation in the context of a roller coaster with a vertical drop and a loop. The original poster presents two main questions: determining the minimum radius of the loop to maintain a specific force limit and calculating the force on a rider at the top of the loop.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between centripetal force and gravitational force, questioning the assumptions about the forces acting on the rider at different points in the loop.
  • There is discussion about the application of conservation of energy to find velocities at different points and how to handle the absence of mass in the calculations.
  • Some participants express confusion about the relevance of the angle of the slope and its impact on the calculations.
  • Questions arise regarding the interpretation of the force at the top of the loop and whether it should be equated to gravitational force.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications on the physics concepts involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculations and assumptions, but there is no explicit consensus on the final approach or solution. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential confusion arising from the problem's wording and the implications of the height and radius in relation to the forces experienced by the rider. The lack of mass in the equations is a point of contention, as it complicates the calculations for force at the top of the loop.

N0ct
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A) A roller coaster has a vertical drop but followed by a loop. The total vertical height of the drop is 66m. It starts as a steep slope at an angle of 75 degrees relative to the horizontal and then enters into a circular path of radius R. In order to stay below 4 times the force of gravity at the bottom of the bend what is the minimum radius of this bottom section of the loop.

B) After the bottom of the dip of radius R (from above) the track gradually transitions to the inverted (top) part of the loop. What is the force on the rider at the top of the loop if the loops height is 33 meters? Would the change fall out of the riders pockets?

Homework Equations



Fc = mV^2/r
PEg (gravitational potential energy) = mgh
KE = 1/2 mv^2
Conservation of Energy : PEf-PEi = KEf-KEi

The Attempt at a Solution



I apologize if what I did here seems completely wrong! -- I tried!A)

Fc < 4Fg
mv^2/r = 4mg
v^2/r = 4g
r = v^2/4g
v=?

EK (bottom) = PEg (top)
1/2mv^2 = mgh
v = √(2x9.8m/s^2x66m)
v = Approx 36m/s

36m/sxcos(75°) = 9.31 m/s

(9.31m/s)^2/9.8m/s^2 = r

2.21m = r

B)

For this question I'm not sure whether or not to assume Fc = Fg.
I found that by using the consrevation of Energy theory, I can equate the changes in Potential and kinetic energies (by subbing the v found in the previous question) to get Vf, the velocity at the top of the loop. (Right?)

I'm stuck at this question, because there is no mass.
Fc = mV^2/r
F = mg
F = ma

...I'm not too sure how to go about it.
If I use the conservation of energy by equating the changes in both Kinetic/potential energy again, I was a bit stumped on how to solve for 'm'.

I hope this is in the right section.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
N0ct said:
A) A roller coaster has a vertical drop but followed by a loop. The total vertical height of the drop is 66m. It starts as a steep slope at an angle of 75 degrees relative to the horizontal
This seems inconsistent. It says vertical drop, then 75 degrees. But I can't see that it makes a difference here, so long as the 66m is from top of drop to bottom of loop.
and then enters into a circular path of radius R. In order to stay below 4 times the force of gravity at the bottom of the bend what is the minimum radius of this bottom section of the loop.

Fc = mV^2/r
PEg (gravitational potential energy) = mgh
KE = 1/2 mv^2
Conservation of Energy : PEf-PEi = KEf-KEi

Fc < 4Fg
I would think the 4g limit includes the 1g that would apply if stationary, so the limit is an extra 3g.
mv^2/r = 4mg
v^2/r = 4g
r = v^2/4g
v=?

EK (bottom) = PEg (top)
1/2mv^2 = mgh
v = √(2x9.8m/s^2x66m)
v = Approx 36m/s
The above seems enough to give an answer.
36m/sxcos(75°) = 9.31 m/s
What is this calculating?
B) After the bottom of the dip of radius R (from above) the track gradually transitions to the inverted (top) part of the loop. What is the force on the rider at the top of the loop if the loops height is 33 meters? Would the change fall out of the riders pockets?

For this question I'm not sure whether or not to assume Fc = Fg.
That is the question to be decided - is Fc more or less than Fg.
I found that by using the conservation of Energy theory, I can equate the changes in Potential and kinetic energies (by subbing the v found in the previous question) to get Vf, the velocity at the top of the loop. (Right?)

I'm stuck at this question, because there is no mass.
The masses will cancel out. Fc > Fg if and only if Fc/m > Fg/m.
 
haruspex said:
so long as the 66m is from top of drop to bottom of loop.

Yes, that is how it's supposed to be pictured.

haruspex said:
I would think the 4g limit includes the 1g that would apply if stationary, so the limit is an extra 3g.

Yes, you are right -- My teacher has demonstrated this question, thank you very much.

So it would have been (as demonstrated),
Ac = V^2/r
r = V^2/ac
r = V^2/3g


haruspex said:
What is this calculating?

A mistake. The angle is unnecessary. >.>

haruspex said:
That is the question to be decided - is Fc more or less than Fg.

The masses will cancel out. Fc > Fg if and only if Fc/m > Fg/m.

Can you please demonstrate how to compute this/the force?
r = 33/2,
v = √2xgx33m (I think)
F = ?
^This portion of the question was not demonstrated; I would like to see -- I'm missing out on as to where/how the masses cancel.

Thank you very much.
 
N0ct said:
v = √2xgx33m (I think)
That's the actual speed at top of loop, √(2g(h-2R)), right? It's a bit confusing decoding from the numbers because 4R happens to equal h.
F = ?
^This portion of the question was not demonstrated; I would like to see -- I'm missing out on as to where/how the masses cancel.
OK, sorry, I see your problem. I was only looking at the last part, where it asks about the fate of the contents of the riders' pockets. Of course, you cannot say what the force is without knowing the mass. The question setter was probably thinking of acceleration and wrote force by mistake. I would answer it with something like "(some calculated number)m, where m is the mass of the rider".
What is the critical speed at top of loop for the riders to keep their cash?
 
haruspex said:
That's the actual speed at top of loop, √(2g(h-2R)), right? It's a bit confusing decoding from the numbers because 4R happens to equal h.

Yes -- mgh = 1/2mv^2, where 'h' (33m) is the height difference between the top of the loop and the top of the coaster.

haruspex said:
OK, sorry, I see your problem. I was only looking at the last part, where it asks about the fate of the contents of the riders' pockets. Of course, you cannot say what the force is without knowing the mass. The question setter was probably thinking of acceleration and wrote force by mistake. I would answer it with something like "(some calculated number)m, where m is the mass of the rider".
What is the critical speed at top of loop for the riders to keep their cash?

Thank you!
 
So what did you get for "Would the change fall out of the riders pockets?"
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K