Centripetal force carousel angle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of centripetal force as it applies to a gondola on a carousel that has just started to rotate. Participants explore the forces at play when the gondola moves away from the center and forms an angle with the string, particularly from a non-accelerated coordinate system perspective.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the forces acting on the gondola when it starts to rotate, suggesting that there must be a force causing it to move away from the center, despite the centripetal force pointing inward.
  • Another participant argues that with constant angular velocity (ω), there is a specific angle at which the gondola can maintain circular motion, and this angle is determined by the balance of forces, including gravity and tension in the string.
  • A different participant emphasizes that the initial motion of the gondola when the ride starts is crucial, as it leads to a tangential acceleration that eventually results in the gondola moving outward.
  • One participant introduces Lagrangian mechanics to derive the equations of motion, suggesting that the forces acting on the gondola can be analyzed mathematically to find the equilibrium position.
  • Another participant notes that the perceived motion in a rotating frame can be attributed to Coriolis force, which affects the gondola's trajectory as it moves outward from the center.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of initial acceleration and the forces acting on the gondola. Some emphasize the importance of the initial motion when the carousel starts, while others focus on the conditions of constant angular velocity and the resulting equilibrium angle. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the forces involved, including the dependence on the angle of the gondola, the effects of initial acceleration, and the transition from tangential to outward motion. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps required to fully understand these dynamics.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying dynamics, centripetal motion, or anyone curious about the physics of amusement park rides and the forces involved in circular motion.

Sheldon123
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

i have got a question about the concept of centripetal force in general. Imagine a gondula of a carousel that has just started to rotate. Each gondula moves away from the center of the circular motion and forms an angle with the string.

What would be the correct physical line of argumentation for explaining the movement away from the center from a coordinate system which is NOT accelerated.

My thoughts:

Since the gondula follows a circular motion there must be centripetal force pointing towards the centre. This is the case as long as ω is constant. But right at that moment when the carousel starts moving there must be a force pointing in the opposite diretion of the centripetal force because an observer outside the carousel can see how the gondula forms an angle with the string. But where does it come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I presume you are referring to a so-called "swing ride". I don't think one should make an argument here that has to do with what happens when the ride starts to move.

What you we can do is show that with constant ω there is only one angle for which the gondola follows circular motion. The radius in this case is not the length of the string, but instead the horizontal component of the length of string. If the gondola is going up or down (assuming the string is taught and has a fixed length) , it follows that the horizontal radius is also changing. So the only way the horizontal radius is not changing is that the gondola is not going up or down. This means the vertical component of the tension in the string must be exactly opposite the force of gravity. There is only one angle where the horizontal tension is what is required for circular motion, and the vertical component of tension exactly opposes the force of gravity.

If the angle is something other than this angle, then the angle will not be constant in time, even when ω is constant. Finding the force that it experiences to cause this would require some more analysis, but it can be done.
 

Attachments

  • Swing Ride.png
    Swing Ride.png
    17.9 KB · Views: 1,401
Last edited:
Hi Mr X,

thanks a lot for your time and quick answer but I am afraid I can't see how this answers the question. When ω is constant, there will be only one angle\varphi (see attached picture) but the question is, why does the person on the swing ride moves away from the center in the first place. According to Newton I, there most be a force responsible for that or at least a component of a force in that direction. Since there is noch such force for someone who watches the thing from the outside (non-accelerated coordinate sytem) because the centripetal force ( in this case) is provided by the vector sum of gravitiy (-y direction) and the force of the string/chain. The only thing I can think of is that the process of starting the rotation must be responsible for that because in that case \omega is not constant (the swing ride accelerates) but I can't figure out a way how to calculate this component.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    58.4 KB · Views: 2,449
I assure you it does not have to with the ride starting. There would be a force even when ω is constant. The equation of motion can be found with Lagrangian mechanics.

To do this I am going to make θ measured upwards from the horizontal. The length to the center is \ell. The height relative to the center is z = \ell sin\theta.

The velocity squared is
\dot{r}^2 = \ell^2 \dot{\theta}^2 + \ell^2 \omega^2 cos^2 \theta

so here is the Lagrangian
\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}m\dot{r}^2 - mgz
\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}m\ell^2 \dot{\theta} + \frac{1}{2}m \ell^2 \omega^2 cos^2 \theta -mg\ell sin\theta
\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \theta} = -m\ell^2\omega^2cos\theta sin\theta - mg\ell cos\theta
= \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{\theta}} = m\ell^2\ddot{\theta}

so here is the equation of motion

\ell^2\ddot{\theta} = -\ell^2\omega^2cos\theta sin\theta - g\ell cos\theta

If you solve for the equilibrium position, \ddot{\theta} = 0, you will get the answer as before (except with a minus sign since this theta is measured up/counterclockwise). If you want to get the actual tension that causes this to happen it is some more work but it can be done.
 
If you watch such a ride start, you will see that there is most definitely some motion associated with start-up. The supports on the carousel start moving and the gondolas stay in place. The resulting angle of the support cables tends to accelerate the gondolas.

This initial acceleration is in a direction tangent to the rotation, of course.

1/4 of a rotation later, the motion imparted by that initial acceleration is no longer tangent to the rotation. It is almost entirely outward. In the rotating frame of reference we would see the direction of motion changing and attribute the perceived acceleration to "Coriolis force". In the inertial frame of reference we see straight line motion -- the tangential motion imparted initially has eventually carried the gondola farther away from the center of the carousel.

Of course, as the gondola's initial motion carries it farther from the center of the carousel on a straight line, the support frame is proceeding in its circular path. The angle of the support cables is changing. The result is continuing tangential acceleration.

In the rotating frame, Coriolis force is causing the gondola to veer away from the direction of rotation. Meanwhile the support cables are pulling it in against this force toward the equilibrium position. The gondola ends up orbitting around the equilibrium position in the direction of the carousel's rotation until the orbit is ultimately damped and equilibrium is attained.
 
Jbriggs 444,

thanks a lot for your last post, it helped me a lot to get a better understanding of the afore mentioned process.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K