Centripetal Force of a particle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of centripetal force in the context of a particle moving in uniform circular motion around a loop, specifically focusing on the conditions at the top of the loop and the implications of setting the normal force to zero to determine minimum velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the normal force (Fn) is set to zero at the top of the loop to find the minimum velocity, suggesting that gravity (Fg) alone should be sufficient to keep the particle in contact with the loop.
  • Another participant interprets the minimum velocity as the speed required for the particle to be suspended solely by gravitational force, indicating that any additional forces would prevent the particle from falling off the loop.
  • A further reply clarifies that setting Fn to zero allows for the calculation of the minimum speed necessary to maintain contact with the track, emphasizing that exceeding this speed would require a greater normal force to keep the particle on the track.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of the role of normal force and gravitational force at the top of the loop, indicating that multiple competing views remain regarding the conditions for minimum velocity.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the forces acting on the particle and the conditions necessary for maintaining contact with the loop, which may not be fully resolved.

vladittude0583
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
This is regarding a particle traveling in a uniform circular motion around a "loop."

I understand that at the very top of the loop, the particle experiences Fg (Force of Gravity) and also Fn (Normal Force) due to contact with the surface, but also experiences acceleration in the "-y" direction. My question is why is it considered minimum velocity when you set the Fn to zero to find the velocity at the very top? Using Newton's Second Law, Fnet, y = may

-Fn - Fg = m (-ay)

The way I am interpreting it is that there is really no Fn to support you at the very top because its pretty much Fg right?

Can someone clarify this idea for me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vladittude0583 said:
This is regarding a particle traveling in a uniform circular motion around a "loop."

I understand that at the very top of the loop, the particle experiences Fg (Force of Gravity) and also Fn (Normal Force) due to contact with the surface, but also experiences acceleration in the "-y" direction. My question is why is it considered minimum velocity when you set the Fn to zero to find the velocity at the very top? Using Newton's Second Law, Fnet, y = may

-Fn - Fg = m (-ay)

The way I am interpreting it is that there is really no Fn to support you at the very top because its pretty much Fg right?

Can someone clarify this idea for me?


Hi there,

The way I will interprete is that at the top of the loop, it is very much the minimum velocity required for you to be suspended just by g acting downwards only. Any other forces, be it normal contact force or centripetal force, is there to prevent you from flying off the loop only.
 
thiotimoline said:
Hi there,

The way I will interprete is that at the top of the loop, it is very much the minimum velocity required for you to be suspended just by g acting downwards only. Any other forces, be it normal contact force or centripetal force, is there to prevent you from flying off the loop only.

So, are you saying that if there was an additional force besides that of gravity itself, than the particle would fall of the loop at the top?
 
vladittude0583 said:
My question is why is it considered minimum velocity when you set the Fn to zero to find the velocity at the very top?
Because the faster you go, the greater the acceleration and the greater normal force needed to keep you on the track. So you can set Fn = 0 to find the minimum speed that still just barely keeps you in contact with the track. If you go any slower, you will fall off the track and never make it through the loop.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
9K