Centripetal versus centrifugal explained

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mitch bass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Centrifugal Centripetal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between centripetal and centrifugal forces, emphasizing that centrifugal force is a fictitious force. Centripetal force acts towards the center of a circular path, while centrifugal force, which is perceived in a rotating reference frame, acts away from the center. The example of a person on a merry-go-round illustrates these concepts, highlighting that inertia causes an object to move tangentially when centripetal force is no longer applied. Observers in different frames of reference perceive these forces differently, reinforcing the idea that centrifugal force does not exist outside of a rotating frame.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with concepts of inertia and reference frames
  • Basic knowledge of circular motion dynamics
  • Ability to visualize forces in a rotating system
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formulation of centripetal force in circular motion
  • Explore the implications of inertia in non-inertial reference frames
  • Learn about real-world applications of centripetal force in engineering
  • Investigate the concept of fictitious forces in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining motion concepts, and engineers involved in designing rotating systems will benefit from this discussion.

mitch bass
can someone please compare and contrast the phenomenon of the centripetal force versus the centrifugal force.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by mitch bass
can someone please compare and contrast the phenomenon of the centripetal force versus the centrifugal force.

First off, there is no such animal as the Centrifugal force or the Centripetal force, there are merely centrifugal and centripetal forces.

Centrifugal means " to flee the center" and Centripetal means "to seek the center"

They are just terms used to decribe whether any given force acts towards or away from a center.
 
Imagine swinging a rock on a rope. A moving object tends to move in a straight line. In order to make the rock move out of a straight line into a circle, you have to keep pulling on the rope: that "cetripetal" force.

Of course, you hand feels the rope pulling back on it ("equal and opposite reaction"). That's "centrifugal" force.

Centripetal force is always directed toward the center of the curve, centrifugal force is always directed away from the center.
 
Centrifugal force is a "fictitious force", hence it is not really a force.

Imagine if a person is on a Merry-go-around spinning. He would feel a "force" that is pulling him away from the Merry-go-around, therefore he has to hold on to the bar on the Merry-go-around enable to stay on, the force that he is exerting on the bar is acting directly inwards with respects to the center of the Merry-go-around, and this force is what we called a "centripetal force". Now imagine the person releases his grip on the bar, and got pull off by this "mysterious force" off the Merry-go-around. An observer that is on the same Merry-go-around, would see that the person is flying "radially" away from the Merry-go-around. But if there is an observer on the ground in a stationary reference frame, he would see this rather differently, he would see the person instead of flying radially, he would see him flying away from the Merry-go-around "tangetially".

People who have done physics knows that the veloctiy vector is always at right angle to the centripetal force, we can therefore say, from the viewpoint of the observer in a staionary non-rotational reference frame that the person is really flying away from the Merry-go-around due to his inertia, because inertia is the resistance of change in motion, in this case, the person's inertia has overcame the centripetal force, and thereby he will fly tangetially away from the Merry-go-around.

The reason that centrifugal force is called a fictitious force is because that it only agrees with the definition of a force (a push or a pull) when the observer is in the same rotating reference frame as the obejct; while an observer in an non-rotational stationary reference frame does not need to be equiped with the concept of centrifugal force. The existnce of centrifugal force is really a matter of fact that which frame of reference that the observers are in.
 
Hyperreality beat me to it, but there is no centrifugal force.

That force is really the tangential velocity "pushing" an object away from the center.

Just some repetitive info.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
771
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K