Chain Falling on a Scale: What is the Reading?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a vertically suspended chain of mass M and length l that falls onto a scale. The objective is to determine the scale's reading as a length x of the chain has fallen. The discussion revolves around concepts of momentum and forces acting on the chain and scale system.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the normal force exerted by the scale and the weight of the chain. There are attempts to apply conservation of momentum and energy principles to derive the scale's reading. Questions arise regarding the correct interpretation of forces acting on the system, particularly the weight of the falling chain and its contribution to the net external force.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning each other's reasoning and clarifying definitions related to forces and momentum. Some participants suggest reconsidering the contributions of the falling chain to the net force, while others express uncertainty about the implications of their calculations. There is no explicit consensus on the final expression for the normal force.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential inconsistencies in their equations and the assumptions made regarding the forces acting on the scale. The discussion reflects a learning process where various interpretations and corrections are explored without reaching a definitive conclusion.

geoffrey159
Messages
535
Reaction score
68

Homework Statement


A chain of mass M and length l is suspended vertically with its lowest end touching a scale. The chain is released and falls onto the scale. What is the reading of the scale when a length of chain, x, has fallen? (Neglect the size of individual links.)

Homework Equations


Momentum, conservation of energy

The Attempt at a Solution



Hello, I have checked threads who dealt with this problem but did not understand everything !

After reading different threads, I understand that the problem is to find the normal force from the scale on the chain.

Firstly, the net force on the scale is equal to the time derivative of momentum:

## \frac{dP_x}{dt} = N_x - W_x = N_x - \frac{M}{l}xg##

The change of momentum is

## \left\{
\begin{array}{}
P_x(t) = \frac{M}{l}(l-x(t)) \times (-\dot x(t) )\\
P_x(t+\triangle t) = \frac{M}{l}(l-x(t+\triangle t)) \times (-\dot x(t+\triangle t))
\end{array}
\right. ##

So

##\frac{dP_x}{dt} = -M \ddot x + \frac{M}{l}({\dot x}^2+ x \ddot x ) = \frac{M}{l}g(x-l) +\frac{M}{l}{\dot x}^2
##

because ##\ddot x = g ##.
In order to find ##\dot x^2##, I use conservation of energy on the point mass located at the top of the chain, which is accelerated by gravity:

## \left.
\begin{array}{}
K_0 = 0 ,\ U_0 = \frac{M}{l} g l = Mg \\
K_x = \frac{1}{2} \frac{M}{l}{\dot x}^2, \ U_x = \frac{M}{l} g (l-x) \\
K_0 + U_0 = K_x + U_x
\end{array}
\right\}
\Rightarrow {\dot x}^2 = 2gx \Rightarrow \frac{dP_x}{dt} = 3\frac{M}{l}gx - Mg ##

So

## N_x = \frac{M}{l}gx + \frac{dP_x}{dt} =4 \frac{M}{l}gx - Mg ##

Is that correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is N_x in your force equation (dp/dt)? I think there may be an inconsistency in that statement.
 
Hello, ##N_x## is the normal force from the scale on the chain
 
Ok, so then what's W_x?

**Oops read it backwards.
 
It is the weight of the chain on the scale after length x has fallen
 
No obviously I'm wrong, the net external force in the system chain-scale is ## N_x - Mg ## and not ## N_x - \frac {M}{l}gx##, so ## N_x =3 \frac {M}{l}gx##,
 
Haha, yea sorry about that, I forgot how a scale worked for a minute. I just went through and double check you, it looks good.
 
The chain that's still in the air doesn't exert a weight force on the scale.
 
yes, but it must be taken into account because it is an external force in the system chain-scale
 
  • #10
Gravity accelerates the chain at a constant velocity. If you drop two balls, one on top of the other (neglecting drag) does on exert a force on the other?
 
  • #11
Also, if you replace your mass/unit length with the entire mass, wouldn't the scale always read more than the weight of the chain?
 
  • #12
I think that in my first attempt I have cheated with the relationship between net external force and momentum.
I am using momentum of the chain-scale system, but don't take into account the weight of the falling chain, but it is an external force.
So without cheating,
## N_x = 3 \frac{M}{l}gx## and not ## N_x = 4 \frac{M}{l}gx - Mg ##
 
  • #13
Doesn't the falling chain have mass (m/l)(l-x)? The chain that's already on the scale has 0 momentum. What do you mean you didn't take into account the weight of the falling chain? Maybe I'm missing something here.
 
  • #14
The definition is net external force = dP/dt.
I used the momentum of the chain-scale system, there is a part that is on the scale at rest, and a part falling.
But I only took into account the weight of the chain on the scale, which is not correct in this system, because the falling part contributes to total external force.
 
  • #15
A way to be 100% sure that It was wrong at first attempt is that ##N_x < 0## for ## 0 \le x \le \frac{l}{4}##, which is not admissible.
 
  • #16
geoffrey159 said:
The definition is net external force = dP/dt.
I used the momentum of the chain-scale system, there is a part that is on the scale at rest, and a part falling.
But I only took into account the weight of the chain on the scale, which is not correct in this system, because the falling part contributes to total external force.
You can get there by looking at the whole system, but it's unnecessarily complicated. All the weigh pan cares about is the speed and density of the chain hitting it.
At time t after release, with what velocity is the chain hitting the pan? What is the rate of change of momentum on those links?

If you want to look at the whole system, that will include gravity acting on the falling part of the chain, and the rate of change of momentum of that part of the chain. These two will balance, which is why you can ignore them.
 
  • #17
From where I'm sitting, I see the scale can read the part that's sitting on it, at rest, definitely. Also, there will be some portion of the chain that has recently come into contact with the scale, and the scale must exert a force greater than the weight force of that segment to slow it down. That's Newtons second law. But I for some reason am not seeing how the top most point of the chain, or the point under that, or... will exert a force on the scale or vice versa.
 
  • #18
haruspex said:
You can get there by looking at the whole system, but it's unnecessarily complicated. All the weigh pan cares about is the speed and density of the chain hitting it.
At time t after release, with what velocity is the chain hitting the pan? What is the rate of change of momentum on those links?

If you want to look at the whole system, that will include gravity acting on the falling part of the chain, and the rate of change of momentum of that part of the chain. These two will balance, which is why you can ignore them.
I'm trying, but I don't understand your reply. Can you restate it? Do you agree with the solution ?
 
  • #19
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
see the scale can read the part that's sitting on it, at rest.
Yes, sorry, I was concentrating on the impact part. I should have written:
All the weigh pan cares about is the speed and density of the chain hitting it, plus the weight of what is already in the pan
geoffrey159 said:
Do you agree with the solution ?
Which solution? It seems to have evolved, and I'm not sure what your current proposal is. At one point you had ##3 \frac{M}{l}gx##, which is what I get.
 
  • #20
I get that too, thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
973
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K