MHB Challenging Classical Mechanics Problems: Can You Solve Them?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving two classical mechanics problems involving motion up and down an incline with kinetic friction. Key equations are provided for calculating distance and time, incorporating initial and final velocities, acceleration due to gravity, and friction. The second problem relates to d'Alembert's principle, emphasizing the use of fictitious forces in non-inertial frames to equate dynamics between different systems. The participant expresses gratitude for the assistance received, indicating that the help will aid in tackling similar problems. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges of applying classical mechanics concepts to specific scenarios.
johnherald
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello i have the difficulty in solving this two problems..thank you for your help math help boards :-) View attachment 8748
 

Attachments

  • 5 & 6.png
    5 & 6.png
    15.5 KB · Views: 145
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1.6

distance up the incline (with kinetic friction present) ...

$\Delta x = \dfrac{v_f^2 - v_0^2}{2a}$

time up the incline ...

$t = \dfrac{v_f-v_0}{a}$

... where $v_f=0$ and $a = -g(\sin{\theta} + \mu \cos{\theta})$time down the incline ...

$\Delta x = v_0 \cdot t + \dfrac{1}{2}at^2 \implies t = \sqrt{\dfrac{2\Delta x}{a}}$

note $v_0 = 0$, $\Delta x$ is the opposite of that found going up the incline and $a = -g(\sin{\theta} - \mu \cos{\theta})$
 
1.5 is related to d'Alembert's principle. We can analyze the dynamics of an accelerating frame of reference (i.e non-inertial) by adding a fictitious force. Since the force in system A is $m*100$, then a fictitious force of $m*10$ must be added to system B so that the dynamics in both systems are equivalent.
 
thanks a lot that will help me solving the other problems similar to that two particular question...:-)
and i have the difficulty solving some problems specially to the questions without a value.. thank you again for your help..
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top