Change in chemical energy of rocket

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
20 replies · 2K views
isukatphysics69
Messages
453
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



piccc.PNG

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


IMG_20180503_234123.jpg


19800*.35 = 6930J
 
Attachments
  • IMG_20180503_234123.jpg
    IMG_20180503_234123.jpg
    14.8 KB · Views: 673
  • piccc.PNG
    piccc.PNG
    10.6 KB · Views: 740
Physics news on Phys.org
isukatphysics69 said:
19800*.35 = 6930J
What is the relationship between the energy expended, the useful work done, and the efficiency?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: isukatphysics69
haruspex said:
What is the relationship between the energy expended, the useful work done, and the efficiency?
energy expended divided by work is efficiency?
 
isukatphysics69 said:
energy expended divided by work is efficiency?
Would that tend to produce a value > 1 or < 1?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: isukatphysics69
haruspex said:
Would that tend to produce a value > 1 or < 1?
it depends tho
 
isukatphysics69 said:
it depends tho
Will the work expended be more or less than the useful work done?
Where might the work expended go?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: isukatphysics69
ok so since there is wasted energy then the work expended is more than the useful work done
 
isukatphysics69 said:
ok so since there is wasted energy then the work expended is more than the useful work done
So what would be a sensible way to define efficiency?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: isukatphysics69
haruspex said:
So what would be a sensible way to define efficiency?
so 35/100 particles of rocketfuel are usefull
so that's 35% so 35% of the total energy is 35% of 19800
 
haruspex said:
Right, so what should you do with the 19800J you calculated?
so total energy expended was 19800 jules. only 35 percent of that is used efficiently so out of the total 19800 6930 was put to use that's what i thought
 
isukatphysics69 said:
so total energy expended was 19800 jules
No. How did you calculate the 19800 J? Go back and check.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: isukatphysics69
haruspex said:
No. How did you calculate the 19800 J? Go back and check.
oh yea ok so the change in chemical potential energy was 19800 joules
 
isukatphysics69 said:
oh yea ok so the change in chemical potential energy was 19800 joules
There are the following quantities of work...

Useful work done
Total work done
19800J
GPE gained
KE gained
Chemical PE lost
Work lost to heat, sound etc.

What are all the relationships between these?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: isukatphysics69
haruspex said:
There are the following quantities of work...

Useful work done
Total work done
19800J
GPE gained
KE gained
Chemical PE lost
Work lost to heat, sound etc.

What are all the relationships between these?
They all have to do with energy
 
isukatphysics69 said:
They all have to do with energy
No, I mean what equations relate them. Some are equal, some add up to equal others...
 
haruspex said:
There are the following quantities of work...What are all the relationships between these?

Total work done = GPE gained + Work lost to heat, sound etc. + KE gained
Chemical PE lost = 19800J Since it is the change in PE
Useful work done = KE gained​
 
isukatphysics69 said:
Total work done = GPE gained + Work lost to heat, sound etc. + KE gained
Yes.
isukatphysics69 said:
Chemical PE lost = 19800J Since it is the change in PE
No. Look at how you calculated 19800J in post #1. I see nothing about chemical PE there.
isukatphysics69 said:
Useful work done = KE gained
You left out GPE gained.
 
haruspex said:
Yes.

No. Look at how you calculated 19800J in post #1. I see nothing about chemical PE there.

You left out GPE gained.
ok there is a mistake there both sides should be multiplied by negative 1 so CPE final - CPE initial will be ΔCPE
 
isukatphysics69 said:
ok there is a mistake there both sides should be multiplied by negative 1 so CPE final - CPE initial will be ΔCPE
No.
Please try to address my points in post #19.