Change in Free Energy when Heating a Substance

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the change in Gibbs free energy when heating a substance, specifically potassium hydride, from 298.15K to 673.15K. Participants explore the relationships between enthalpy, entropy, and temperature, and how these factors influence the Gibbs free energy change during the heating process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes using the Shomate equation to calculate enthalpy changes and expresses uncertainty about the correct temperature to use for Gibbs free energy calculations.
  • Another participant suggests integrating the change in Gibbs free energy over the temperature range, indicating a mathematical approach to the problem.
  • Some participants clarify that the Gibbs free energy equation does not imply spontaneity unless specific conditions, such as being in contact with a constant temperature reservoir, are met.
  • There are discussions about using the heat capacity to derive enthalpy and entropy changes, with references to specific equations for calculating these values.
  • One participant questions whether it is appropriate to use the temperature difference directly in the calculations, indicating a need for clarification on this point.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods for calculating Gibbs free energy changes, with no consensus on the best approach. Some agree on the need to integrate specific equations, while others question the implications of spontaneity and the use of temperature differences.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the dependence of heat capacity on temperature and the implications of using different temperatures in the Gibbs free energy calculations. The discussion also highlights the complexity of integrating thermodynamic equations accurately.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and professionals in chemistry and thermodynamics, particularly those interested in the relationships between temperature, enthalpy, entropy, and Gibbs free energy.

RoySRamirez
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Heating anything implies a change in enthalpy and entropy which should produce a change in free energy (Gibbs). However, free energy is defined at constant temperature and temperature was increased from A to B. What can I do?
Hello everyone!

I'm new to the forum, and I've been trying to solve a problem that seems farily but I can't still convince myself of having the right (or wrong) answer.

Imagine you warm up one mol of for example potassium hydride from standard temperature 298.15K to 673.15K (400 deg C). It is clear that there is going to be a change in both enthalpy and entropy which luckly can be calculated from NIST's Chembook [1]. The enthalpy change involved in heating this substance can obtained from the Shomate equation which evaluates to +20.77 kJ which makes sense since energy needs to be absorbed by the substance in order to heat it up. Using the Shomate equation again the enthalpy at 400 deg C can be calculated. By subtracting it from its enthalpy at 298.15K we get the enthalpy change which is equal to 100.99 J/K. This also makes sense since warming up things should increase their degree of "disorder".

So far so good! Now the tricky part. The change in Gibbs free energy is defined as: dG = dH - T*dS. This equation involves only one temperature since it is supposed to be defined for constant temperatures. I came up with different ideas on what temperature to use including the average between the starting and finishing temperatures, the final temperature, and even the change in temperature dT.

I think this last one (dT) could actually be correct since the Gibbs free energy is defined as G = H - T*S, and thus a differential version of it where temperature is not constant would look like this dG = dH - d(T*S) [2]. Nevertheless, I get negative values for the dG meaning that warming up this chemical is exergonic or "spontaneous". My intuition tells me that this can't be true. Although "spontaneous" is a very vague concept (or misused word), I believe nature should opose to warming up things. If you heat a metal with a blow torch until it is glowing red, and then you stop you don't see the metal's red color increase in intensity for a while before going off. As soon as you cut the heat source it starts cooling off which is a more "natural" thing to do.

I would appreciate if you could give me any insights on what would be the right approach for calculating this dG, specially on which concepts I am missing.

Thank you very much for your help :) Refs
[1] https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=C7693267&Units=SI&Mask=2#Thermo-Condensed
[2] https://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch21/gibbs.php
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You should simply integrate:
## G_2-G_1=\int_{T_1}^{T_2} dG/dT \; dT##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
You are correct to say that the correct equation for the free energy change is $$\Delta G=\Delta H-\Delta (TS)$$ But that doesn't mean that the process occurs spontaneously. That is only implied if the system is an open (flow) system in contact with a constant temperature reservoir .
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
DrDu said:
You should simply integrate:
## G_2-G_1=\int_{T_1}^{T_2} dG/dT \; dT##.
More specifically, from ##dU=TdS-pdV## and ##G=U+pV-TS## you get ## dG=-SdT-Vdp##, so that at constant pressure ## G_2-G_1=-\int_{T_1}^{T_2} S(T) dT##.
 
DrDu said:
More specifically, from ##dU=TdS-pdV## and ##G=U+pV-TS## you get ## dG=-SdT-Vdp##, so that at constant pressure ## G_2-G_1=-\int_{T_1}^{T_2} S(T) dT##.
Hello DrDu, thank you very much for your explanation. Si I just take the the Shomte equation for enthalpy S(T), integrate it from T1 to T2, and that should be it?
Thanks!
 
Chestermiller said:
You are correct to say that the correct equation for the free energy change is $$\Delta G=\Delta H-\Delta (TS)$$ But that doesn't mean that the process occurs spontaneously. That is only implied if the system is an open (flow) system in contact with a constant temperature reservoir .
Hello @Chestermiller , thank you very much! So is it correct to simply use the temperature difference to calculate the change in free energy?
 
In practice, one proceeds in the following way to calculate the Gibbs energy values for chemical species (see, for example, the Outotec HSC Chemistry Software). The enthalpy, ##H##, and entropy, ##S##, can be calculated by means of the heat capacity, ##c_p##, at constant pressure:
$$H(T)=H_f(298.15)+ \int_{298.15}^T c_p\, dT+\Sigma H_{tr}$$
Here, ##H_f(298.15)## is the enthalpy of formation at 298.15##K## and ##H_{tr}## is the enthalpy of transformation of the substance when there are transformations within the considered temperature interval.
For the entropy one has:
$$S(T)=S(298.15) + \int_{298.15}^T (c_p/T)\, dT+\Sigma H_{tr}/T_{tr}$$
Here, ##S(298.15)## is the standard entropy of the substance.
The Gibbs energy, ##G(T)##, can then be written:
$$G(T)=H(T)-TS(T)$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
RoySRamirez said:
Hello DrDu, thank you very much for your explanation. Si I just take the the Shomte equation for enthalpy S(T), integrate it from T1 to T2, and that should be it?
Thanks!
Yes, integrate the Shomate equation for entropy (not enthalpy) S(T). The equations given for H(T) and S(T) by Lord Jestocost are a more simple but less precise approximation (at least as long as cp is assumed to be constant and not temperature dependent, otherwise they are exact). As Chestermiller pointed out, you could alternatively take the differences of H and TS at the two temperatures. All results should coincide.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lord Jestocost
RoySRamirez said:
Hello @Chestermiller , thank you very much! So is it correct to simply use the temperature difference to calculate the change in free energy?
I don't understand what you are asking.
 
  • #10
Usually the change is Gibbs free energy with temperature is calculated from: $$\frac{d(G/T)}{d(1/T)}=H$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
12K