I Change of coordinates in a potential energy field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding changing coordinates in potential energy fields, specifically in a 2D gravitational context. The participant analyzes a particle's potential energy and kinetic energy while questioning why a specific coordinate transformation does not yield harmonic motion. It is clarified that potential energy is not the sole force acting on the mass; the constraining force from the particle's path must also be considered. While changing coordinates is permissible, the choice must align with the problem's assumptions to ensure accurate results. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between potential energy and the constraints of motion.
kal8578
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
When a particle subjected to a conservative force has a constraint between multiple coordinates, one can change variables in the potential energy. But doing so seems to change the gradient, and thus the force, and I do not understand why.
Hello,

I am having some confusions in what should be basic pointwise Newtonian mechanics, and would like to get some help with that. It is all about changing coordinates in potential energies.

Let us start by considering a point particule in a 2d world with an axis x (left-right) and an axis z (up-down) with constant gravitational acceleration g (like on Earth). Said particle, of mass m, lies on a ground of shape z = f(x).

Capture d’écran 2024-08-28 à 09.02.47.png


In what follows, I will further refine the analysis to z = αx2.

What I think to be true (tell me if it's not !)

While the potential energy of the particle is V(x) = mg αx2, which is quadratic - like 1/2kx2 - its motion is not that of an harmonic oscillator. The reason behind that is that the kinetic energy reads
T = 1/2m(\dot{x}2+\dot{z}2) = 1/2m(1+4α2.x2.)\dot{x}2.

So that conservation of energy yields
1/2m(1+4α2.)\dot{x}2 + mg α2 = cst
Which is not of the form required for an harmonic oscillator, namely $... \dot{x}α2 + ... xα2 = cst$.

To get an harmonic oscillator, the choice of f(x) should be different : essentially, one should introduce s the curvilinear abscissa along the z=f(x) curve, so that T = m \dot{s}α2/2, and choose f so that f(s) is proportional s2.

My problem

Why can I just not write (as the usual ``think of potential energies as landscapes on which a ball can roll'' way of thinking goes):
V(x) = α m g x 2

And use from there Newton's law of motion to derive, with \vec{r} the position of the mass m:
m \ddot{\vec{r}} = - \vec{\nabla} V = - 2 α m g x ex

which projected on the x-axis, yields
m \ddot{x} = - 2 α m g x

which is an harmonic oscillator equation ?

In general,
- Why can't I change coordinates in potential energies?
- How to know which choices of coordinates lead to correct results?

Thanks !

PS : Sorry for the typesetting I don't know how to make LaTeX work on this website
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
kal8578 said:
Why can I just not write (as the usual ``think of potential energies as landscapes on which a ball can roll'' way of thinking goes):
V(x) = α m g x 2
Because the potential is not the only source of forces on the mass. There is also the constraining force provided to keep the mass on the parabola.
kal8578 said:
In general,

- Why can't I change coordinates in potential energies?
You can. It is perfectly fine to do that. However, if the motion is harmonic in some variable ##s##, it obviously will not be harmonic in a variable that is not directly proportional to ##s##.

kal8578 said:
- How to know which choices of coordinates lead to correct results?
The choice that is consistent with the assumptions of the problem.

kal8578 said:
PS : Sorry for the typesetting I don't know how to make LaTeX work on this website
There is a link to https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/ right below the post editor pane.
1724843274738.png
 
Thanks ! (Sorry for the late reply, computer problem)
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/

Similar threads

Back
Top