Change of variable in indefinite integrals

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on justifying the change of variables in indefinite integrals, specifically the transformation from ∫e^(ax)dx to ∫(1/a)e^u du. The original poster proposes that by using the fundamental theorem of calculus, a primitive function can be derived through a continuous function and a change of variable. A participant clarifies that if F(x) and G(u) are defined appropriately, their derivatives will match, confirming that they are indeed anti-derivatives of the same function. The concept of substitution in integrals is explained as the reverse application of the chain rule. The exchange highlights the connection between differentiation and integration through variable substitution.
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
I've had this very basic question on the back of my mind for 2 almost years now and I think I've found a satisfactory answer. The question is this most simple one: how do we justify a change of variables such as

\int e^{ax}dx = \int \frac{1}{a}e^udu

in an indefinite integral? My "solution" is this... We are looking for a primitive F(\beta) to f(\beta). By one version of the fondamental thm, as soon as f is continuous, such a primitive is given by

F(\beta)=\int_{\phi(\alpha)}^{\phi(\beta)}f(x)dx = \int_{\alpha}^{\beta}(f\circ \phi)(s)\frac{d\phi}{ds}ds

where \phi:(\alpha,\beta)\rightarrow (\phi(\alpha), \phi(\beta)) is C^1. (Ths is just the change of variable thm)

This may be total nonsense, but my eyes are itching from tiredness so I wouldn't know. Any comments on the above or an opinion on how to justify change of variable in indefinite integrals will be warmly appreciate tomorrow morning.

Good night!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quasar987 said:
I've had this very basic question on the back of my mind for 2 almost years now and I think I've found a satisfactory answer. The question is this most simple one: how do we justify a change of variables such as

\int e^{ax}dx = \int \frac{1}{a}e^udu

in an indefinite integral? My "solution" is this... We are looking for a primitive F(\beta) to f(\beta). By one version of the fondamental thm, as soon as f is continuous, such a primitive is given by

F(\beta)=\int_{\phi(\alpha)}^{\phi(\beta)}f(x)dx = \int_{\alpha}^{\beta}(f\circ \phi)(s)\frac{d\phi}{ds}ds

where \phi:(\alpha,\beta)\rightarrow (\phi(\alpha), \phi(\beta)) is C^1. (Ths is just the change of variable thm)

This may be total nonsense, but my eyes are itching from tiredness so I wouldn't know. Any comments on the above or an opinion on how to justify change of variable in indefinite integrals will be warmly appreciate tomorrow morning.

Good night!
I'm not at all sure what you are asking. Certainly if
F(x)= \int e^{ax}dx and
G(u)= \frac{1}{a}\int e^u du
then, by the chain rule, with u(x)= ax,
\frac{dG}{dx}= \frac{dG}{du}\frac{du}{dx}
= \left(\frac{1}{a}e^u\right)(a)
= e^u= e^{ax}= \frac{dF}{dx}
Since F and G have the same derivatives they are anti-derivatives (indefinite integrals) of the same thing.

"Substitution" in integrals is just the chain rule "in reverse".
 
ack, I had tried things with the chain rule, but never this. Yep, this is exactly what I was loking for, thanks Halls!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
599
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K