MHB Change of variables heat equation

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
\[
\alpha^2T_{xx} = T_t + \beta(T - T_0)
\]
where \(\beta\) is a constant and \(T_0\) is the temperature of the surrounding medium. The initial temperature distribution is \(T(x, 0) = f(x)\) and the ends \(x = 0\) and \(x = \ell\) are maintained at \(T_1\) and \(T_2\) when \(t > 0\).

Show that the substitution \(T(x, t) = T_0 + U(x, t)e^{-\beta t}\) reduces the problem to the following one:
\[
\alpha^2U_{xx} = U_t
\]
with new initial conditions and boundary conditions for \(U\).

With that substitution, I obtain:
\begin{align}
\alpha^2U_{xx} &= -\beta(U_t - T_0U)\\
\alpha_1^2U_{xx} &= U_t - T_0U
\end{align}
What is going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Change of varibles heat equation

dwsmith said:
\[
\alpha^2T_{xx} = T_t + \beta(T - T_0)
\]
where \(\beta\) is a constant and \(T_0\) is the temperature of the surrounding medium. The initial temperature distribution is \(T(x, 0) = f(x)\) and the ends \(x = 0\) and \(x = \ell\) are maintained at \(T_1\) and \(T_2\) when \(t > 0\).

Show that the substitution \(T(x, t) = T_0 + U(x, t)e^{-\beta t}\) reduces the problem to the following one:
\[
\alpha^2U_{xx} = U_t
\]
with new initial conditions and boundary conditions for \(U\).

With that substitution, I obtain:
\begin{align}
\alpha^2U_{xx} &= -\beta(U_t - T_0U)\\
\alpha_1^2U_{xx} &= U_t - T_0U
\end{align}
What is going wrong?
I'm not quite sure of the problem here. For example,
T = T_0 + U(x, t)e^{- \beta t} \implies T_t = U_t e^{- \beta t} - \beta U e^{- \beta t}

Do the same for U_x and U_xx, then sub into the original equation. There are a ton of cancellations which gives you the final answer.

Are you having problems with the derivatives or is it something else?

-Dan
 
Re: Change of varibles heat equation

topsquark said:
I'm not quite sure of the problem here. For example,
T = T_0 + U(x, t)e^{- \beta t} \implies T_t = U_t e^{- \beta t} - \beta U e^{- \beta t}

Do the same for U_x and U_xx, then sub into the original equation. There are a ton of cancellations which gives you the final answer.

Are you having problems with the derivatives or is it something else?

-Dan

I forgot to use the product rule
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top