Changeover from deceleration to acceleration

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the transition of the universe from deceleration to acceleration, particularly focusing on the relationship between gravitational forces and the repulsive force attributed to dark energy. Participants explore the conditions under which this change occurs and the implications of the cosmological constant.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the universe's changeover from deceleration to acceleration occurs exactly when the repulsive force equals the gravitational force, linking this to the mass density of the vacuum and matter.
  • Another participant asserts that the repulsive force is constant rather than increasing, although they acknowledge the proportional increase of the cosmological constant with distance.
  • There is a discussion about the constancy of dark energy over time while matter density decreases, suggesting that this could support the original query regarding the timing of acceleration.
  • A later reply confirms that expansion accelerates when the density parameter of dark energy exceeds half that of matter.
  • Reference is made to the SNAP project, which suggests that expansion began accelerating a few billion years ago, although its implementation and data collection remain uncertain.
  • Another participant notes that SNAP has not yet been built and discusses the availability of observational evidence and future surveys related to the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the repulsive force and its implications for the universe's acceleration. There is no consensus on the exact conditions or timing of the transition from deceleration to acceleration.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of dark energy and gravitational forces, as well as the status of proposed experiments like SNAP, which may affect interpretations of the universe's expansion history.

Ranku
Messages
434
Reaction score
18
Did the universe changeover from deceleration to acceleration exactly after the moment when the increasing repulsive force became equal to the decreasing gravitational force?

[Would like to confirm if that would be consistent with the fact that acceleration starts when the mass density of the vacuum becomes bigger than half of mass density of matter.]
 
Space news on Phys.org
It's a constant repulsive "force", if you will, not an increasing one. Otherwise you're correct.
 
Ich said:
It's a constant repulsive "force", if you will, not an increasing one. Otherwise you're correct.

But doesn't the repulsive force of the cosmological constant increase in proportion to distance?
 
But doesn't the repulsive force of the cosmological constant increase in proportion to distance?
So does gravitation. I was referring to DE being constant over time, while matter gets diluted.
 
Ich said:
So does gravitation. I was referring to DE being constant over time, while matter gets diluted.

I know ;). So then I assume I can confirm my original query about the universe accelerating just after repulsive force overtakes gravitational force.
 
Yes. Expansion accelerates when [itex]\Omega_{\Lambda}>\Omega_M/2[/itex].
 
SNAP suggests expansion began accelerating a few billion years ago. You can search for SNAP on Arxiv.
 
SNAP was a proposed experiment that hasn't been built, let along put into space. It's currently not likely that it will ever fly (though something similar probably will at some point). It certainly hasn't taken any data yet though...

If you're after a good, reasonably current, review of observational evidence and probable future surveys try http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.0982" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K