Changing ##\tan\frac{x}{2}## to ##\cos x## for a proof

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the relationship between the half-angle tangent and cosine in the context of eccentric anomalies. The initial equation provided is transformed through algebraic manipulation, leading to an expression for cos(φ) that needs to be simplified. A Weierstraß substitution is suggested to facilitate calculations, ultimately leading to a clearer expression for cos(φ). Participants clarify that the variable e is not special except for the condition e ≠ 1, as certain cases lead to undefined values in the context of the proof. The conversation emphasizes the importance of handling special cases in orbital mechanics, particularly when e equals or exceeds 1.
brotherbobby
Messages
749
Reaction score
169
Homework Statement
Given ##\tan\dfrac{\theta}{2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{1-e}{1+e}}\tan\dfrac{\phi}{2}##, prove ##\boxed{\cos\phi=\dfrac{\cos\theta-e}{1-e\cos\theta}}##
Relevant Equations
(1) Componendo and dividendo : If ##\dfrac{a}{b}=\dfrac{c}{d}\Rightarrow \dfrac{a-b}{a+b}=\dfrac{c-d}{c+d}##.

(2) ##\cos x=\dfrac{1-\tan^2\frac{x}{2}}{1+\tan^2\frac{x}{2}}##
Problem Statement : The statement of the problem again. If ##\tan\dfrac{\theta}{2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{1-e}{1+e}}\tan\dfrac{\phi}{2}##, prove ##\boldsymbol{\cos\phi=\dfrac{\cos\theta-e}{1-e\cos\theta}}##.

Attempt : Transposing and squaring what's given, we get ##\tan^2\dfrac{\phi}{2}=\dfrac{1+e}{1-e}\tan^2\dfrac{\theta}{2}##.
Upon applying the componendo and dividendo to both sides of the equation, ##\small{\dfrac{1-\tan^2\phi/2}{1+\tan^2\phi/2}=\dfrac{1-e-(1+e)\tan^2\theta/2}{1-e+(1+e)\tan^2\theta/2}\Rightarrow \cos\phi=\dfrac{1-\tan^2\theta/2-e(1+\tan^2\theta/2)}{1+\tan^2\theta/2-e(1-\tan^2\theta/2)}}{\large{\color{red}{\overset{\mathbf ?}{\mathbf \Rightarrow}}}} \cos\phi=\dfrac{\cos\theta-e}{1-e\cos\theta}##.

Request : As you can see on the right side of the above calculation, I cannot show how my calculated value ##\cos\phi=\dfrac{1-\tan^2\theta/2-e(1+\tan^2\theta/2)}{1+\tan^2\theta/2-e(1-\tan^2\theta/2)}=\dfrac{\cos\theta-e}{1-e\cos\theta}?##

I cannot show how the second expression reduces to the third, which is what's required.

A hint would be welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't checked but it looks as if the Weierstraß substitution ##\tan\left(\dfrac{x}{2}\right)=t ## could make calculations a lot easier.
 
Sorry I got it. My bad. Just divide the numerator and denominator of the last expression I obtained by ##1+\tan^2\theta/2##.

To conclude in a good way, I complete the solution using writing ink and ##\text{Autodesk Sketchbook}^{\circledR}##, assuming am not violating anything.

1739901241577.png
 
Here is my solution by the Weierstraß substitution:

Set ##\tan\left(\dfrac{\phi}{2}\right)=t\, , \,\tan\left(\dfrac{\theta}{2}\right)=s\,.## Then ##s^2(1+e)=t^2(1-e)## and
\begin{align*}
\dfrac{\cos(\theta)-e}{1-e\cos(\theta)}&=\dfrac{\dfrac{1-s^2}{1+s^2}-e}{1-e\dfrac{1-s^2}{1+s^2}}=\dfrac{1-s^2-e-es^2}{1+s^2-e+es^2}=\dfrac{(1-e)-t^2(1-e)}{(1-e)+t^2(1-e)}=\dfrac{1-t^2}{1+t^2}=\cos\left(\dfrac{\phi}{2}\right)\,.
\end{align*}

It is basically the same but with far less to write.
 
I didn't follow your last but one step @fresh_42 . I paste it below.

1739902927981.png


There are terms containing ##e## in the numerator and denominator, viz. ##\dfrac{1-t^2-e(1-t^2)}{1+t^2-e(1+t^2)}##. Why do these terms vanish?
 
brotherbobby said:
I didn't follow your last but one step @fresh_42 . I paste it below.

View attachment 357484

There are terms containing ##e## in the numerator and denominator, viz. ##\dfrac{1-t^2-e(1-t^2)}{1+t^2-e(1+t^2)}##. Why do these terms vanish?
Just factor the numerator and denominator and divide-out the common factor:$$\dfrac{(1-e)-t^{2}(1-e)}{(1-e)+t^{2}(1-e)}=\dfrac{(1-e)(1-t^{2})}{(1-e)(1+t^{2})}=\dfrac{(1-t^{2})}{(1+t^{2})}$$
 
renormalize said:
Just factor the numerator and denominator and divide-out the common factor:$$\dfrac{(1-e)-t^{2}(1-e)}{(1-e)+t^{2}(1-e)}=\dfrac{(1-e)(1-t^{2})}{(1-e)(1+t^{2})}=\dfrac{(1-t^{2})}{(1+t^{2})}$$
Many thanks and apologies. So there's nothing special about the variable ##e## except ##e\ne 1##.
 
brotherbobby said:
Many thanks and apologies. So there's nothing special about the variable ##e## except ##e\ne 1##.
If ##e=1## then ##\tan \left(\dfrac{\theta}{2}\right)=0 ## and ##\theta=0.## But then, the formula for ##\cos(\phi)## isn't defined anymore so that we can exclude the case ##e=1.##
 
brotherbobby said:
Many thanks and apologies. So there's nothing special about the variable ##e## except ##e\ne 1##.
The equation ##\tan\frac\theta 2 = \sqrt{\frac{1-e}{1+e}} \tan\frac\phi 2## pertains only if ##0\le e<1##. Here, ##\theta## and ##\phi## are the eccentric and true anomalies.

In the case that ##e=1##, one of two (or both) of total energy and total angular momentum is zero. Angular momentum being zero means that true anomaly is undefined, as is eccentric anomaly. This is a radial trajectory (aka a degenerate trajectory) and needs special treatment. Total energy being zero (which also results in ##e=1##) is a parabolic trajectory. This needs separate treatment. Finally ##e>1## means a non-degenerate hyperbolic trajectory. It too needs special treatment.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
Back
Top