Changing ##\tan\frac{x}{2}## to ##\cos x## for a proof

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving a relationship between the tangent of half angles and cosine in the context of eccentric and true anomalies in orbital mechanics. The original poster presents a specific equation involving the tangent function and seeks to demonstrate its equivalence to a cosine expression.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various algebraic manipulations, including transposing and squaring terms, and applying the Weierstraß substitution to simplify calculations. Questions arise regarding the reduction of expressions and the treatment of specific terms in the equations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints and clarifications on algebraic steps, while others express confusion about specific transformations. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to understand the relationships between the variables involved, with no explicit consensus reached on the final proof.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints regarding the variable \( e \), with discussions noting that it must not equal 1, as this leads to undefined conditions in the context of the problem. The applicability of the equation is also limited to certain ranges of \( e \), indicating the need for careful consideration of the physical context.

brotherbobby
Messages
764
Reaction score
170
Homework Statement
Given ##\tan\dfrac{\theta}{2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{1-e}{1+e}}\tan\dfrac{\phi}{2}##, prove ##\boxed{\cos\phi=\dfrac{\cos\theta-e}{1-e\cos\theta}}##
Relevant Equations
(1) Componendo and dividendo : If ##\dfrac{a}{b}=\dfrac{c}{d}\Rightarrow \dfrac{a-b}{a+b}=\dfrac{c-d}{c+d}##.

(2) ##\cos x=\dfrac{1-\tan^2\frac{x}{2}}{1+\tan^2\frac{x}{2}}##
Problem Statement : The statement of the problem again. If ##\tan\dfrac{\theta}{2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{1-e}{1+e}}\tan\dfrac{\phi}{2}##, prove ##\boldsymbol{\cos\phi=\dfrac{\cos\theta-e}{1-e\cos\theta}}##.

Attempt : Transposing and squaring what's given, we get ##\tan^2\dfrac{\phi}{2}=\dfrac{1+e}{1-e}\tan^2\dfrac{\theta}{2}##.
Upon applying the componendo and dividendo to both sides of the equation, ##\small{\dfrac{1-\tan^2\phi/2}{1+\tan^2\phi/2}=\dfrac{1-e-(1+e)\tan^2\theta/2}{1-e+(1+e)\tan^2\theta/2}\Rightarrow \cos\phi=\dfrac{1-\tan^2\theta/2-e(1+\tan^2\theta/2)}{1+\tan^2\theta/2-e(1-\tan^2\theta/2)}}{\large{\color{red}{\overset{\mathbf ?}{\mathbf \Rightarrow}}}} \cos\phi=\dfrac{\cos\theta-e}{1-e\cos\theta}##.

Request : As you can see on the right side of the above calculation, I cannot show how my calculated value ##\cos\phi=\dfrac{1-\tan^2\theta/2-e(1+\tan^2\theta/2)}{1+\tan^2\theta/2-e(1-\tan^2\theta/2)}=\dfrac{\cos\theta-e}{1-e\cos\theta}?##

I cannot show how the second expression reduces to the third, which is what's required.

A hint would be welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't checked but it looks as if the Weierstraß substitution ##\tan\left(\dfrac{x}{2}\right)=t ## could make calculations a lot easier.
 
Sorry I got it. My bad. Just divide the numerator and denominator of the last expression I obtained by ##1+\tan^2\theta/2##.

To conclude in a good way, I complete the solution using writing ink and ##\text{Autodesk Sketchbook}^{\circledR}##, assuming am not violating anything.

1739901241577.png
 
Here is my solution by the Weierstraß substitution:

Set ##\tan\left(\dfrac{\phi}{2}\right)=t\, , \,\tan\left(\dfrac{\theta}{2}\right)=s\,.## Then ##s^2(1+e)=t^2(1-e)## and
\begin{align*}
\dfrac{\cos(\theta)-e}{1-e\cos(\theta)}&=\dfrac{\dfrac{1-s^2}{1+s^2}-e}{1-e\dfrac{1-s^2}{1+s^2}}=\dfrac{1-s^2-e-es^2}{1+s^2-e+es^2}=\dfrac{(1-e)-t^2(1-e)}{(1-e)+t^2(1-e)}=\dfrac{1-t^2}{1+t^2}=\cos\left(\dfrac{\phi}{2}\right)\,.
\end{align*}

It is basically the same but with far less to write.
 
I didn't follow your last but one step @fresh_42 . I paste it below.

1739902927981.png


There are terms containing ##e## in the numerator and denominator, viz. ##\dfrac{1-t^2-e(1-t^2)}{1+t^2-e(1+t^2)}##. Why do these terms vanish?
 
brotherbobby said:
I didn't follow your last but one step @fresh_42 . I paste it below.

View attachment 357484

There are terms containing ##e## in the numerator and denominator, viz. ##\dfrac{1-t^2-e(1-t^2)}{1+t^2-e(1+t^2)}##. Why do these terms vanish?
Just factor the numerator and denominator and divide-out the common factor:$$\dfrac{(1-e)-t^{2}(1-e)}{(1-e)+t^{2}(1-e)}=\dfrac{(1-e)(1-t^{2})}{(1-e)(1+t^{2})}=\dfrac{(1-t^{2})}{(1+t^{2})}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
renormalize said:
Just factor the numerator and denominator and divide-out the common factor:$$\dfrac{(1-e)-t^{2}(1-e)}{(1-e)+t^{2}(1-e)}=\dfrac{(1-e)(1-t^{2})}{(1-e)(1+t^{2})}=\dfrac{(1-t^{2})}{(1+t^{2})}$$
Many thanks and apologies. So there's nothing special about the variable ##e## except ##e\ne 1##.
 
brotherbobby said:
Many thanks and apologies. So there's nothing special about the variable ##e## except ##e\ne 1##.
If ##e=1## then ##\tan \left(\dfrac{\theta}{2}\right)=0 ## and ##\theta=0.## But then, the formula for ##\cos(\phi)## isn't defined anymore so that we can exclude the case ##e=1.##
 
brotherbobby said:
Many thanks and apologies. So there's nothing special about the variable ##e## except ##e\ne 1##.
The equation ##\tan\frac\theta 2 = \sqrt{\frac{1-e}{1+e}} \tan\frac\phi 2## pertains only if ##0\le e<1##. Here, ##\theta## and ##\phi## are the eccentric and true anomalies.

In the case that ##e=1##, one of two (or both) of total energy and total angular momentum is zero. Angular momentum being zero means that true anomaly is undefined, as is eccentric anomaly. This is a radial trajectory (aka a degenerate trajectory) and needs special treatment. Total energy being zero (which also results in ##e=1##) is a parabolic trajectory. This needs separate treatment. Finally ##e>1## means a non-degenerate hyperbolic trajectory. It too needs special treatment.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K