Changing the Hamiltonian to a new frame of reference

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on transforming the Hamiltonian for a system of three particles with masses \mu_i, specifically when transitioning to a frame of reference where \mu_1 is at rest. The Hamiltonian is defined as H = -\frac{1}{2\mu_1}\Delta_1 -\frac{1}{2\mu_2}\Delta_2 -\frac{1}{2\mu_3}\Delta_3 + V_1(r_3 - r_1) + V_2(r_3 - r_2). It emphasizes that one should not set the momentum p to zero in the Hamiltonian, as this represents a special solution rather than a general case. The discussion outlines three levels of coordinate changes: Lagrangian level, Hamiltonian function level through canonical transformations, and Hamiltonian operator level via unitary transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with canonical transformations
  • Knowledge of unitary transformations in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of classical mechanics and coordinate systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study canonical transformations in Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Explore unitary transformations and their applications in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the center of mass frame in classical mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of momentum conservation in different reference frames
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in classical mechanics and quantum mechanics, as well as students and researchers interested in Hamiltonian dynamics and frame transformations.

AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Suppose I'm considering particles of mass \mu_i, 1 \leq i \leq 3, located at positions r_i. Suppose I ignore the potential between \mu_1 and \mu_2. Then the Hamiltonian I'd write down would be

<br /> H = -\frac{1}{2\mu_1}\Delta_1 -\frac{1}{2\mu_2}\Delta_2 - \frac{1}{2\mu_3}\Delta_3 + V_1(r_3 - r_1) + V_2(r_3 - r_2).<br />

But what if I instead want to work in a frame of reference in which \mu_1 is at rest? How should I go about changing H? I'm never very sure of myself when I do these kinds of calculations, so any help would be appreciated...thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The are several options, but first of all no particle will be "at rest" at the level of the Hamiltonian; it's a special solution (in classical mechanics) where one momentum p vanishes, i.e. where one particle is at rest. You must not set p=0 in H.

Coordinate changes can be done at three levels
- on the level of the Lagrangian, as usual in classical mechanics
- on the level of the Hamiltonian function, i.e. using canonical transformations
- on the level of the Hamiltonian operator, i.e. using unitary transformations

There is a nice example using unitary transformations showing what really happens when we introduce the c.o.m. frame for a central potential; the new coordinates can be interpreted as r,R,p,P, where R does not appear in H, so P is conserved. That means tha strictly speaking we should not set P=0, but we have a plane wave in R and P.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K