Changing the Hamiltonian to a new frame of reference

AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Suppose I'm considering particles of mass [itex]\mu_i[/itex], [itex]1 \leq i \leq 3[/itex], located at positions [itex]r_i[/itex]. Suppose I ignore the potential between [itex]\mu_1[/itex] and [itex]\mu_2[/itex]. Then the Hamiltonian I'd write down would be

[tex] H = -\frac{1}{2\mu_1}\Delta_1 -\frac{1}{2\mu_2}\Delta_2 - \frac{1}{2\mu_3}\Delta_3 + V_1(r_3 - r_1) + V_2(r_3 - r_2).[/tex]

But what if I instead want to work in a frame of reference in which [itex]\mu_1[/itex] is at rest? How should I go about changing [itex]H[/itex]? I'm never very sure of myself when I do these kinds of calculations, so any help would be appreciated...thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The are several options, but first of all no particle will be "at rest" at the level of the Hamiltonian; it's a special solution (in classical mechanics) where one momentum p vanishes, i.e. where one particle is at rest. You must not set p=0 in H.

Coordinate changes can be done at three levels
- on the level of the Lagrangian, as usual in classical mechanics
- on the level of the Hamiltonian function, i.e. using canonical transformations
- on the level of the Hamiltonian operator, i.e. using unitary transformations

There is a nice example using unitary transformations showing what really happens when we introduce the c.o.m. frame for a central potential; the new coordinates can be interpreted as r,R,p,P, where R does not appear in H, so P is conserved. That means tha strictly speaking we should not set P=0, but we have a plane wave in R and P.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K