Undergrad Channel electron multiplier as an electron source

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the use of a channel electron multiplier (CEM), specifically a modified channeltron, as an electron source. The user, Chris, has removed the anode cap and applied a negative bias of approximately -3.5kV, but is not observing any output pulses despite various configurations. The setup operates under a vacuum pressure of ~5E-7 Torr, and Chris has previously achieved success with an unmodified CEM. The issue may stem from the specific model's treatment to minimize photoelectron generation or the configuration of the output circuit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of channel electron multipliers (CEM) and their operation
  • Knowledge of vacuum systems and pressure measurements (e.g., Torr, mbar)
  • Familiarity with electronic circuit design, particularly for high-speed signal processing
  • Experience with photoelectron generation and detection techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate modifications to channel electron multipliers for enhanced photoelectron detection
  • Research high-speed electronic circuit design for optimal output signal retrieval
  • Explore the effects of different biasing configurations on electron emission in CEMs
  • Learn about the treatment processes for CEMs that may inhibit photoelectron generation
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and engineers working in the fields of electron microscopy, particle detection, and vacuum technology, particularly those interested in optimizing electron sources and signal detection methods.

Christoffer B
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Channel electron multiplier as an electron source
Hi!

I'm playing around with a type of electron (and by electron/molecule interactions: ion) source that was briefly touched upon in the 1960's.

The basic idea is to use a channel electron multiplier "channeltron" with the anode removed; similar to a single MCP channel. The burst of electrons out will then be observable as a pulse on the output end of the channel, similar to extracting the dynode signal from a PMT.

The initiator of the burst can be anything from a light source producing photoelectrons, to a beta source like Sr-90. I went for the former.

I have modified a commercial channeltron by removing its anode cap, and provided negative bias at the cone, but no pulses are observed.

The channel has a built-in resistor to make sure the electrons don't reach zero potential within the channel, before they hit the anode. In my setup this can be shorted if needed.

However both with Rint shorted or not, I see no output pulses, regardless of light strenght (a quartz window provides light to the cone)

Please see attached image and schematic of the setup. I am unsure if it's an electronics problem or a fundamental issue.

Pressure is ~5E-7 Torr, bias is approx. -3.5kV.

The signal has been observed both directly on oscilloscope, through a preamplifier, and through a pulse inverter and preamplifier. same disappointing result.

Thank you for the interest!

Chris
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20210922_221657_588.jpg
    IMG_20210922_221657_588.jpg
    75.9 KB · Views: 197
  • channeltron.jpg
    channeltron.jpg
    8.2 KB · Views: 212
Physics news on Phys.org
Chris
It looks as if the device is de-mountable, so have you the necessary high vacuum?
Also are you using very short pulses. You will need to arrange the output circuit/load resistor so high speed is obtainable.
Does the light pulse fall on a photo emitter?
 
Thank you for your reply!

I should have explained, one of the flanges goes to a turbomolecular pump and ion gauge - working pressure is about 10E-6-7 mbar.

The plan is not to use pulses but to use so low light flux that the photoelectrons generated are in the range of 100's /second. The emissive surface is the entrance cone of the multiplier.

I have tested this previously with an unmodified CEM, showing decent control over count rate by adjusting light. This one however is a different model, and modified as mentioned. Perhaps it is treated to avoid photoelectron generation, as that would just be noise in many applications.

I was also concerned photoelectrons would be repulsed by the large negative voltage, and be attracted to the nearby chamber wall out of the CEM, instead of into it, so I tried with reverse polarity; ground at the cone and +4kV at the output. No difference.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
Replies
144
Views
21K