Infrared Detectors & The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between infrared photodetectors, specifically HgCdTe detectors, and the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. Participants explore how these detectors can generate current from black body radiation at room temperature, raising questions about the implications for thermodynamic principles, particularly in scenarios lacking a temperature gradient.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how an HgCdTe infrared photodetector can generate current from the black body radiation of room temperature water without a temperature gradient, suggesting a conflict with the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.
  • Another participant discusses the operation of CMOS sensors and solar panels, indicating that they may not extract useful work from a single temperature reservoir, but rather require a temperature difference.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that the thermal motion of electrons in sensors contributes to dark current, rather than infrared radiation directly causing electron movement.
  • Some participants propose that the charge separation process in pixel wells of sensors allows for the capture of photons, but question the energy balance in this process.
  • There is mention of the need for a solar panel to be at a lower temperature than the emitting object to effectively capture radiation, implying a requirement for multiple temperature reservoirs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the ability of infrared detectors and solar panels to operate effectively without a temperature gradient. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the implications for the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the interactions between infrared radiation, detector operation, and thermodynamic principles, noting that assumptions about energy transfer and temperature gradients are critical to the discussion.

  • #151
Shining a laser at an underwater photodiode to produce power violates no laws of thermodynamics. I could run solar panels in my swimming pool if I really wanted to. Why do you wish to do this?
This is quite different from your initial scenario.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Science news on Phys.org
  • #152
hutchphd said:
Shining a laser at an underwater photodiode to produce power violates no laws of thermodynamics. I could run solar panels in my swimming pool if I really wanted to. Why do you wish to do this?
This is quite different from your initial scenario.

So now I make a really big detector and point it at a 300k lake surface, to heat the 320k water with the 3.5 micrometer photon flux off the 300k surface, with no laser.
 
  • #153
This thread has run its course. You've been repeatedly told that what you suggest isn't possible and you're chasing your tail (and getting others to chase it) making little changes to your scenario to try to keep it alive. Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd, DaveE and Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
16K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
918
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
7K