Charge on Semicircle: Electric Field Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter freezer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of the electric field due to a charge distributed along a semicircle, contrasting it with a full ring. The electric field equation is given as E = \hat{z} \frac{\rho_l R(-\hat{r}R + \hat{z}Z)}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 (R^2 + Z^2)^{3/2}}\int_{0}^{\pi }d\phi. The challenge arises from the asymmetry introduced by using a semicircle, which alters the contributions to the electric field, necessitating separate integrals for the vertical and radial components. The discussion emphasizes the need for careful integration to account for these differences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with integral calculus
  • Knowledge of the concepts of symmetry in physics
  • Basic understanding of electrostatics and Coulomb's law
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from continuous charge distributions
  • Learn about the application of integrals in calculating electric fields
  • Research the effects of symmetry on electric field calculations
  • Explore advanced topics in electrostatics, such as potential energy and field lines
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in electrostatics, particularly those studying electric fields generated by non-uniform charge distributions.

freezer
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is not a homework problem so there is no problem statement. More of a conceptual question.

Consider a charge on a ring:
eler3.gif


If this was a semicircle opposed to a ring, how would this change the equation since there is not an opposing dEr force.

<br /> <br /> \boldsymbol{E} = \boldsymbol{\hat{z}} \frac{\rho_l R(-\hat{\boldsymbol{r}}R + \hat{\boldsymbol{z}Z})}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 (R^2 + Z^2)^{3/2}}\int_{0}^{\pi }d\phi <br /> <br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The vertical component is still easy to calculate (as you just have a smaller part of the ring contributing to it), but the other component (due to the broken symmetry it does not vanish any more) will need its own integral. No idea how easy/messy that gets.
 
So I would have to do it twice.

dE = dEr + dEz
 
The integrals are different, but yes.
 
Does this look reasonable:

<br /> <br /> \frac{Q}{4\pi \varepsilon_0(R^2 + Z^2)^{3/2} }(Z\hat{z}-R\hat{r})<br /> <br />
 
Z and z are the same?

That would mean the electric field points in the same direction as the "r" line in the sketch. No, that cannot work.
It would be easier to find the error if you show your whole work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
881
Replies
11
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K