Charged wire inside a linear dielectric

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
jennyjones
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



see attachment 2

Homework Equations



a.


The Attempt at a Solution



see atachment 1


i am stuck at problem a. the question is to write down the boundary conditions for that the E field has to satisfy infinetly far away from the wire and at the boundary of the dielectric z = 0.

I'm not sure how to do this, any help is welcome

thanks

Jenny
 

Attachments

  • Foto op 10-05-14 om 12.28.jpg
    Foto op 10-05-14 om 12.28.jpg
    31.6 KB · Views: 578
  • Schermafbeelding 2014-05-10 om 12.34.04.jpg
    Schermafbeelding 2014-05-10 om 12.34.04.jpg
    49.5 KB · Views: 625
Physics news on Phys.org
Dat mag niet. Groetjes B. N.
 
You have the following equations, valid everywhere
[tex]\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E}=0, \quad \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{D}=\rho, \quad \vec{D}=\epsilon \vec{E}.[/tex]
In your case you have
[tex]\epsilon=\Theta(z)+\epsilon_{r} \Theta(-z).[/tex]
To get the boundary conditions you just apply Stokes's theorem to the first equation with an arbitrary rectangular surface perpendicular to the surface. This leads to the condition that the tangential components of the electric field must be continuous across the surface, i.e., in your case
[tex]\vec{e}_z \times [\vec{E}(x,y,0^+)-\vec{E}(x,y,0^-)]=0,[/tex]
because [itex]\vec{e}_z[/itex] is the normal vector of the dielectric's boundary surface.

Further you use an infinitesimal cube parallel to the boundary on the 2nd equation. This yields the boundary condition
[tex]\vec{e}_z [\vec{D}(x,y,0^+)-\vec{D}(x,y,0^-)] = \sigma.[/tex]
Here [itex]\sigma[/itex] is the surface charge density on the surface of the dielectric.