Charges, conservation of energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves four charged particles placed at the corners of a square, with the objective of determining the time taken for the square to collapse to zero size. The subject area includes electrostatics and conservation of energy principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply conservation of energy to find the velocity of the charges as they move toward the center of the square. They express concerns about their calculus skills, particularly in evaluating an integral related to the time taken for the collapse.
  • Some participants question the clarity of the original poster's presentation and express a desire for more accessible solutions in textbooks.
  • Others suggest that the technique used by the original poster seems appropriate, while acknowledging the complexity of the integral involved.
  • There is mention of using Mathematica for evaluating the integral, with discussions about the challenges of manipulating the resulting antiderivative.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's approach. Some express agreement with the technique, while others share their own difficulties with the integral. There is no explicit consensus yet, but the dialogue appears to be constructive.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenges posed by the integral and the limitations of available resources for self-study, reflecting on the difficulties of evaluating complex mathematical expressions.

Tentothe
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Four particles, two with charge +1.0 x 10^-6 C and two with charge -1.0 x 10^-6 C, are placed at the corners of a square of side 1.0 m. Each has mass 1.0 mg, and they are released from rest. Find the time taken for the square of charges to collapse to zero size.

The particles are placed with like charges on the corners diagonal to each other, like so:

+ -
- +

Homework Equations



Potential energy for a pair of point charges:

U = \frac{kQ_{1}Q_{2}}{d}

The Attempt at a Solution



The charges move along the diagonals of the square toward the center. When a side of the square decreases in length by an amount ds, each charge moves an amount sqrt(2)*ds toward the center. The time taken for it to do so is dt = [sqrt(2)*ds]/v, where v is the velocity of the charge at its current position.

Electric force is conservative and no outside forces are acting, so energy is conserved. So I can determine the velocity in terms of the current length of the side of the square using conservation of energy. I determine the electric potential energy of the system when the charges are first released by adding pairs:

U = -\frac{kQ^{2}}{d} - \frac{kQ^{2}}{d} + \frac{kQ^{2}}{\sqrt{2}d} - \frac{kQ^{2}}{d} - \frac{kQ^{2}}{d} + \frac{kQ^{2}}{\sqrt{2}d}

where k = 9 x 10^9 N*m^2/C^2, Q = 1.0 x 10^-6 C, d = 1.0 m, so

U = -0.02327 J. K = 0 because the charges start at rest.

At side length a with a < d,

U = \frac{-0.02327 N*m^{2}}{a}, K = 4(0.5mv^{2}) = 2mv^{2}

Setting the states equal, plugging in given values, and solving for v gives:

v = 108 \sqrt{\frac{1 - a}{a}}

Next, I plug this into the expression for dt to get the differential time, but I use a = 1 - s in the velocity to put it in terms of the charge's displacement from the side of the original square. Adding them all up gives the integral:

t = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{108}\int\sqrt{\frac{1-s}{s}}ds

evaluated from s = 0 m to s = 0.5 m (center of the square, where the sides collapse to zero).

Admittedly, my calculus skills are rusty and I forgot how to evaluate that integral (help?), but I used Mathematica and got a value of 1.2854. This gave me:

t = 0.01311 * 1.2854 = 0.017 s

I have no idea whether or not I'm going about this correctly. Can anyone point out any mistakes I've made? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nobody? Is there anything unclear in how I've presented my attempt at a solution? I really wish textbooks would come with answers to all problems rather than only a select few. It would make self-study much easier.
 
I think your technique is all right. I didn't verify it numerically, though since I don't have access to Mathematica and the antiderivative given by the online integrator is really intimidating to manipulate. And I don't see anything wrong with using Mathematica, that integral is really hard to solve.
 
Thanks for the response. The antiderivative given by Mathematica had an arctan in it, so I was thinking trigonometric substitution was to be used somewhere along the line, but all of the techniques I tried failed. It's good to hear that someone else finds it a difficult integral and that I haven't necessarily forgotten all of my calculus!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
962
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K