Check Answers to Quantum Minima Qs: In-State Vector Operator

  • Thread starter Thread starter Beer-monster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
Beer-monster
Messages
285
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to "sure"up my Quantum Mechanics and found an sheet of mostly conceptual review questions. A sort of "Quantum minima".

I'd like to check my answers to a couple of these.

Firstly:

In terms of state vector the wavefunction is the expansion coefficient (probability amplitude) of a state i.e

[tex]\psi = \langle x \left | \psi \right\rangle[/tex]

What happens if you put an operator (e.g. p) between the bra and ket as if you were calculating an expectation value? i.e.

[tex]\left\langle x \left | p \right | \psi \right \rangle[/tex]

My guess is that the action of the operator on the state vector [itex]\left|\psi\right\rangle[/itex] will collapse the vector to a single basis vector of p [itex]\left| p \right\rangle[/itex] the expression above would reduce to an element of a basis transformation matrix [itex]\left\langle x | p \right\rangle[/itex]

Is that correct...at least in part?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not quite. The action of p on the ket psi leads to a ket phi, generally different. Then the matrix element with the bra x leads to a complex number, namely phi(x).
 
Thanks for the reply.

What would the physical interpretation of the complex number phi(x) be? The wavefunction of the state with eigenvalue of p?