Check if relation is equivalent

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter issacnewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalent Relation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The relation defined as \(m \sim n\) in \(\mathbb{Z}\) if \(mn > 0\) is confirmed to be not an equivalence relation. The primary reason is the failure of reflexivity, as the pair \((0,0)\) does not satisfy the condition \(mn > 0\). Therefore, this relation does not meet the criteria for equivalence relations, which require reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of equivalence relations in mathematics
  • Familiarity with reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity properties
  • Basic knowledge of integer properties in \(\mathbb{Z}\)
  • Ability to interpret mathematical notation and relations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of equivalence relations in detail
  • Explore examples of equivalence relations in different mathematical contexts
  • Learn about non-equivalence relations and their implications
  • Investigate the role of reflexivity in defining relations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying abstract algebra, and anyone interested in the properties of relations in set theory.

issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Hello

I have to check if the following relation is an equivalence relation.
\[m\sim n \;\;\mbox{in}\;\;\mathbb{Z}\;\;\mbox{if}\; mn > 0\]

I think this relation fails to be reflexive since $(0,0)$ does not belong to
this relation. Hence this is not an equivalent relation. Is this ok ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IssacNewton said:
Hello

I have to check if the following relation is an equivalence relation.
\[m\sim n \;\;\mbox{in}\;\;\mathbb{Z}\;\;\mbox{if}\; mn > 0\]

I think this relation fails to be reflexive since $(0,0)$ does not belong to
this relation. Hence this is not an equivalent relation. Is this ok ?

Thanks
Yes. This is good.
 
caffeinemachine said:
Yes. This is good.

Thanks
(Emo)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K