MHB Check if relation is equivalent

Click For Summary
The relation defined as \(m \sim n\) in \(\mathbb{Z}\) if \(mn > 0\) is examined for equivalence. It is determined that the relation is not reflexive because the pair \((0,0)\) does not satisfy the condition. Consequently, it cannot be classified as an equivalence relation. The conclusion is affirmed by participants in the discussion. The analysis confirms that the relation fails to meet the criteria for equivalence.
issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Hello

I have to check if the following relation is an equivalence relation.
\[m\sim n \;\;\mbox{in}\;\;\mathbb{Z}\;\;\mbox{if}\; mn > 0\]

I think this relation fails to be reflexive since $(0,0)$ does not belong to
this relation. Hence this is not an equivalent relation. Is this ok ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IssacNewton said:
Hello

I have to check if the following relation is an equivalence relation.
\[m\sim n \;\;\mbox{in}\;\;\mathbb{Z}\;\;\mbox{if}\; mn > 0\]

I think this relation fails to be reflexive since $(0,0)$ does not belong to
this relation. Hence this is not an equivalent relation. Is this ok ?

Thanks
Yes. This is good.
 
caffeinemachine said:
Yes. This is good.

Thanks
(Emo)
 

Thread 'A variant of the Monty Hall problem'

There is a nice little variation of the problem. The host says, after you have chosen the door, that you can change your guess, but to sweeten the deal, he says you can choose the two other doors, if you wish. This proposition is a no brainer, however before you are quick enough to accept it, the host opens one of the two doors and it is empty. In this version you really want to change your pick, but at the same time ask yourself is the host impartial and does that change anything. The host...
View full post »

Similar threads

MHB Equivalence Relations: Solving & Proving Reflexivity, Symmetry & Transitivity
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
MHB Show that ~ is an equivalence relation
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
MHB Equivalence Classes: Solving Cbarker1's Problem
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
MHB Different Number of Equivalence Relations
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
MHB Can you explain how the law of logic was used to reach this conclusion?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
MHB Help with an Equivalence Relation?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
MHB Upper Bound of Sets and Sequences: Analyzing Logic
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
MHB An Equivalence Relation with Cauchy Sequences
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
MHB Problem understanding relations syntax.
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
MHB Binary Relations and Equivalence Classes | Proving R is an Equivalence Relation
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K