Checking commutativity property with addition table

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the commutativity property in mathematical systems, specifically using the example of a "Four minute clock" and a "Five minute clock." Participants explore the implications of symmetry in addition tables and the distinction between commutativity and associativity.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a "Four minute clock" with numbers 0, 1, 2, and 3, and claims that symmetry across the main diagonal in the addition table indicates commutativity.
  • The same participant notes that in a "Five minute clock," the addition table does not show symmetry along the main diagonal, yet asserts that the commutative property still holds, citing the associative property instead.
  • Another participant corrects the first by clarifying that the property a+(b+c) = (a+b)+c is the associative property, not commutative, and provides the correct addition table for the "Five minute clock." They assert that the table is symmetric about the main diagonal, confirming commutativity.
  • A later reply emphasizes that reflection along the main diagonal means entry i,j equals entry j,i, reinforcing the definition of commutativity.
  • One participant expresses understanding after the clarification, indicating that they found the explanation helpful.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions of commutativity and associativity, but there is initial confusion regarding the implications of symmetry in the addition tables. The discussion reflects differing interpretations of the properties as they apply to the examples provided.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific properties and definitions, but there is no consensus on the interpretation of symmetry in relation to commutativity in the context of the "Five minute clock." The discussion remains somewhat unresolved regarding the implications of the addition table's symmetry.

dalarev
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
I saw the technique of using a mathematical system called the "Four minute clock". Basically, the clock has 4 numbers, 0, 1, 2 and 3, and only one hand. We can make a summation table which will look like the image attached.

According to the text, if there is symmetry (reflection) across the main diagonal, the system is commutative.


The problem came up when I attempted a 5 minute clock. Same clock, except this time we have 5 numbers: 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4. Filling out the table, we see that there is NO evident symmetry along the main diagonal, yet the commutative property still applies to this system.
Namely: a+(b+c) = (a+b)+c

The system does not pass the commutativity test, yet it still works? Am I missing something?
 

Attachments

  • addcommutativity.PNG
    addcommutativity.PNG
    27.8 KB · Views: 598
Physics news on Phys.org
For one the property a+(b+c) = (a+b)+c is the associative property not the commutative property. The commutative property is ab = ba. I can't see your picture yet, but the table should look like

01234
12340
23401
34012
40123

Where the entry in the position i,j is i + j (mod 5).
This table is symmetric about the main diagonal, which verifies that it is commutative. It is also associative, however there is no quick check to determine this property.
 
matticus said:
For one the property a+(b+c) = (a+b)+c is the associative property not the commutative property. The commutative property is ab = ba.

You're correct about that, as confirmed here:
http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/LinAlg/PropsOfMatrixArith.aspx"

01234
12340
23401
34012
40123

Where the entry in the position i,j is i + j (mod 5).
This table is symmetric about the main diagonal, which verifies that it is commutative. It is also associative, however there is no quick check to determine this property.

That is the correct table, but according to these notes (new image I have attached), there should be reflection ALONG the main diagonal, not only surrounding it.
 

Attachments

  • c16233.jpg
    c16233.jpg
    40.9 KB · Views: 626
Last edited by a moderator:
when they say there is a reflection along the main diagonal they mean that entry i,j = j,i, (i.e. i + j = j + i, the definition of commutivity. it's not just magic!) which you can see is happening here.
 
matticus said:
when they say there is a reflection along the main diagonal they mean that entry i,j = j,i, (i.e. i + j = j + i, the definition of commutivity. it's not just magic!) which you can see is happening here.

Ahh, I see. Good explanation, thank you for that.

/thread solved
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K