Chemical energy into mechanical.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the efficiency of the human body in converting chemical energy from food into mechanical energy, particularly in the context of physical activities such as climbing. Participants explore the implications of this efficiency on caloric intake and weight management.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that if the body is 18-26% efficient in converting chemical energy into mechanical energy, then 74-82% of consumed energy is not "burned" for mechanical work.
  • Others clarify that the remaining energy is utilized for other bodily functions, such as maintaining body temperature and metabolic activities.
  • A participant proposes that to compensate for energy expended during a physical task, one could consume 1.18-1.26 times the energy used, but this is challenged by another participant who states that the total caloric intake must account for the efficiency rate.
  • There is a discussion about whether the excess energy consumed would lead to fat gain, with some arguing that it would not, as the body uses energy for various metabolic processes beyond mechanical work.
  • One participant draws a parallel to the misconception that humans only use 10% of their brain, emphasizing that the body requires energy for essential life-sustaining functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to interpret the efficiency of energy conversion and its implications for caloric intake and weight management. There is no consensus on the exact relationship between energy expenditure and caloric consumption without weight gain.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the concept of efficiency in terms of mechanical work versus overall metabolic needs, highlighting the complexity of energy use in the human body. The discussion includes assumptions about energy conversion rates and the definitions of "burned" energy.

peripatein
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Given that our body is 18-26% efficient in converting chemical energy into mechanical, does that mean that 74-82% of what I consume is not burned? Furthermore, assuming a certain task requires 1000 KJ, how many meals 2000 KJ each will I need to consume for completing it without gaining fat?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The efficiency is measured in terms of desired output. The Mechanical output is 18-26%, the rest is used in other bodily activities like maintaining our body temperature.

For the second question, just find out the energy whose 18%/26% is 1000 KJ.
 
peripatein said:
Given that our body is 18-26% efficient in converting chemical energy into mechanical, does that mean that 74-82% of what I consume is not burned?

It is burnt either to serve another needs, or burnt - and lost. Think why you are sweating when running - to get rid of excess heat. Where do the excess heat comes from?
 
So let me get this straight. Let's say I am to climb a mountain and most of the energy is spent on attaining a certain altitude. So chemical energy turns into mechanical energy which is in turn converted into potential energy. Supposing I would consume about 1000KJ in the process of climbing. Once I attain the desired altitude I'd like to compensate myself for the calorie loss but without gaining any weight. Does that mean that I can eat up to 1.18-1.26 of 1000KJ, hence 1180-1260KJ?
 
Nope. You need to eat that much amount whose 18% is 1000 KJ. That would be minimum of 3864.15 KJ (for 26% efficiency).
 
But won't the rest 2864.15kJ be turned into fat?
 
!? It won't. As mentioned previously, the rest will be consumed in other metabolic activity. Human body is designed to live, not to do mechanical work.

The rest of the energy is required to sustain the life in Human body. That 26% is the "efficiency" of the human body to do mechanical work only, so it accounts only mechanical energy, not other metabolics.
 
Yea, don't get hung up on the "efficiency" word too much. They're referring to mechanical motion specifically, but you need to do a lot more than just move around in order to continue to exist.

This reminds me of the "humans only use 10% of their brain" fallacy. Your brain has to keep you breathing, and keep your heart beating, etc... So, having 10% of anything in your body to do anything more than simply keep you from collapsing into a blob of (mostly carbon) goo is nothing to look down on.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K