Chemical Potential Energy and Kinetic Energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the conversion of chemical potential energy to kinetic energy in the context of a car accelerating from 0 mph to 64 mph, with specific focus on the energy required for different segments of this acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relevance of chemical potential energy in relation to kinetic energy, questioning whether it is necessary for solving the problem. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between energy requirements for different speed increments.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing calculations based on the kinetic energy formula. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the role of chemical potential energy, and some guidance has been offered regarding the application of the kinetic energy equation.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential complexities such as engine efficiency, which may not be accounted for in this simplified scenario. Participants are also noting the importance of units in expressing energy.

pewpew23
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The chemical potential energy in a certain amount of gasoline is converted to kinetic energy in a car that increased its speed from 0 mph to 32 mph. The car accelerated to 64 mph. Compared to the energy required to go from 0 to 32 mph, the energy required to go from 32 mph to 64 mph is

(A) half as much
(B) as much
(C) twice as much
(D) three times as much
(E) four times as much

Homework Equations



KE = 1/2mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Is there any equation for chemical potential energy?
I don't know what to do with just the KE equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The chemical potential energy in this question is a red herring. All you need is the kinetic energy. If you need twice as much kinetic energy, then you need twice as much chemical potential energy, it's a 1-1 correspondence (at least for simple problems like this, other factors such as engine efficiency at different temperatures are too complicated for this).
 
so going from 0 to 64 would require twice as much kinetic and chemical potential energy as going from 0 to 32?

and going to 0 to 32 would require the same amount as going to 32 to 64?
 
No, use your formula. KE=1/2mv^2

KE final - KE initial = energy required
 
1/2m(32)^2 - 1/2(0)^2 = 512m

1/2m(64)^2 - 512m = 1536m

512m/1536 = 3 times as much
 
Yea, looks good to me, except energy is expressed in J=joules not meters. =)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
15K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K