Chemical Potential Homework: Ideal Monatomic Gas

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the chemical potential of an ideal monatomic gas, specifically addressing the equation \(\mu = \frac{\partial U}{\partial N}\). The incorrect application of the equation \(U = \frac{3}{2}NkT\) to derive \(\mu = \frac{3}{2}kT\) is clarified, emphasizing the necessity to hold entropy (S) and volume (V) constant during differentiation. The correct expression for the chemical potential is provided as \(\mu = -kT \ln\left(\frac{V}{N}\left(\frac{4 \pi mU}{3h^2}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}\right)\). The thermodynamic identity \(dU = TdS - PdV + \mu dN\) is essential for understanding the derivation of \(\mu\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic identities, specifically \(dU = TdS - PdV + \mu dN\)
  • Familiarity with the concept of chemical potential in thermodynamics
  • Knowledge of ideal gas laws and properties of monatomic gases
  • Basic calculus, particularly partial differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the chemical potential for different types of gases
  • Learn about the implications of holding variables constant in thermodynamic equations
  • Explore the relationship between temperature, entropy, and volume in thermodynamic systems
  • Investigate the role of statistical mechanics in deriving thermodynamic properties
USEFUL FOR

Students in undergraduate physics or chemistry programs, particularly those focusing on thermodynamics and statistical mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to chemical potential and ideal gases.

Crush1986
Messages
205
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


I just have a question about chemical potential for ideal monatomic gas. I see that by definition \mu = \frac{\partial U}{\partial N}

Homework Equations


\mu = \frac{\partial U}{\partial N}

The Attempt at a Solution


I was wondering why it is wrong to use U=3/2NkT take the partial with respect to N and get \mu = 3/2kT.

I know this isn't right, but what is exactly wrong with it?

The correct equation for the chemical potential of a monatomic ideal gas by the way is
\mu = -kT \ln({\frac{V}{N}(\frac{4 \pi mU}{3h^2}})^\frac{3}{2})[/B]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm thinking there is something to do with the variables that need to be held fixed, they are entropy and volume. Does 3/2NkT somehow not keep these values fixed maybe?
 
Crush1986 said:
I'm thinking there is something to do with the variables that need to be held fixed, they are entropy and volume. Does 3/2NkT somehow not keep these values fixed maybe?
Indeed. You need to start from the thermodynamic identity
$$
dU = T dS - PdV + \mu dN
$$
from which you will see that
$$
\mu = \left( \frac{\partial U}{\partial N} \right)_{S,V}
$$
 
DrClaude said:
Indeed. You need to start from the thermodynamic identity
$$
dU = T dS - PdV + \mu dN
$$
from which you will see that
$$
\mu = \left( \frac{\partial U}{\partial N} \right)_{S,V}
$$

Yes, I most definitely see that.

My biggest issue right now is why is it not correct to use U=\frac {f}{2}NkT take that partial with respect to N and obtain an answer? My thought is that this equation doesn't hold S and V constant inherently, but how would I see that? Just that fact that T is in the equation maybe?
 
Yes, you would have a term in ##\partial T / \partial N## in there.
 
DrClaude said:
Yes, you would have a term in ##\partial T / \partial N## in there.
Thank you very much. Little simple things like this keep holding me up a little. Hopefully my math skills tighten up in these last few years of my undergraduate studies.
 
You can take comfort in the fact that you had the right intuition as to why simply taking the derivative of U didn't work. The more you use math, the better your skills.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K