- #71
- 435
- 350
Actually, wall street journal does report about flight data:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-...ntional-nosedive-11652805097?mod=hp_lead_pos2
https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-...ntional-nosedive-11652805097?mod=hp_lead_pos2
WSJ behind paywall when I attempt to read article. Reuters refers to the WSJ reporting with additional interviews.Actually, wall street journal does report about flight data:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-...ntional-nosedive-11652805097?mod=hp_lead_pos2
One source told Reuters that investigators were looking at whether the crash was a "voluntary" act involving crew inputs to the controls, though that does not necessarily mean the dive was intentional.
The cockpit voice recorder was damaged during the crash and it is unclear whether investigators have been able to retrieve any information from it.
The first couple of paragraphs and the summary statement under the headline succinctly state the US position:WSJ behind paywall when I attempt to read article. Reuters refers to the WSJ reporting with additional interviews.
Thanks. It's paywalled, but the snip I can read contains that critical piece of info the ABC article lacks. ABC mentioned no flaps or landing gear, which means nothing.Actually, wall street journal does report about flight data:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-...ntional-nosedive-11652805097?mod=hp_lead_pos2