Choosing materials for space structures

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the selection of materials for structures intended for interstellar travel, emphasizing the need for high strength-to-weight ratios and durability against environmental factors such as radiation and corrosion. Steel and aluminum are identified as potential materials for pressurized habitats, with concerns about their longevity in space environments. The conversation highlights the lack of long-term data on material performance, particularly for advanced alloys, and notes that fatigue, creep, and corrosion are critical factors affecting spacecraft lifespan. The Voyager spacecraft, launched in 1977, serves as a historical benchmark for mission duration and material resilience.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of materials science, particularly in aerospace applications
  • Familiarity with spacecraft design principles, including pressurization and structural integrity
  • Knowledge of environmental factors affecting materials in space, such as radiation and corrosion
  • Awareness of historical spacecraft missions and their material performance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced alloys and their properties for aerospace applications
  • Investigate the effects of radiation on material degradation over extended periods
  • Learn about the design and engineering of pressurized habitats for space travel
  • Study the failure modes of materials used in long-duration space missions
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, materials scientists, and researchers focused on the development of long-lasting structures for interstellar travel will benefit from this discussion.

astrogeek84
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Interstellar travel is mostly a though experiment at this stage (although NASA will be launching the solar sail SunJammer in a couple of years). My question is a very broad one about what type of materials would be well-suited for structures to support interstellar travel.

Any human habitat would be pressurized (to ~14-21 psia) and (probably) made out of steel (like the Centaur, the upper stage of the Atlas V rocket) or aluminum in the shape of a cylinder. What could be the expected life of such a structure in this environment (corrosion due to moisture, radiation, etc.).
Is there an "ideal" material for this application? How might you estimate a usable life for the structure? I've never really seen much data where material performance is extrapolated to centuries (rather than years). When a structure of this sort does fail, what would be the failure mode?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Usually for spacecraft , one wants a high strength-to-weight ratio. One wishes to minimize mass (propulsive energy/power requirements) that must be transported long distances.

We do not have much experience of highly engineered materials (advanced alloys and materials) over more than a few decades.

Fatigue/creep, and possibly erosion/corrosion, would be limiting over long periods of time.

Most applications of spacecraft are within the neighborhoods of the Earth or solar system, so the lifetime might be 7 years, 10 years, or 30 years, or mission time + margin. We are a lot smarter now than we were when the Voyager spacecraft were launched.

SPACECRAFT LIFETIME
The Voyager spacecraft launched in August and September of 1977 and spent more than 11 years exploring the likes of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune before officially heading off toward interstellar space in 1989.

. . . .
http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/ spacecraft /
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
67K
Replies
12
Views
4K