MHB Cilian's question at Yahoo Answers regarding integration by partial fractions

AI Thread Summary
The integral of the function (19x^2 - x + 4) / (x(1 + 4x^2)) is evaluated using partial fractions. The decomposition is expressed as A/x + (Bx + C)/(1 + 4x^2), leading to a system of equations to solve for A, B, and C. The resulting integrals are computed as 4ln|x|, (3/8)ln(1 + 4x^2), and (1/2)arctan(2x). Combining these results gives the final answer: 4ln|x| + (3/8)ln(1 + 4x^2) - (1/2)arctan(2x) + C. This method effectively demonstrates the application of integration by partial fractions.
Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

Cilian said:
Find the integral
\[\int\frac{19x^2-x+4}{x(1+4x^2)}\]

Here is a link to the question:

Integral of ((19x^2)-x+4)/(x(1+4(x^2)))? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Cilian,

We're going to use partial fractions to evaluate this integral. With that said, we note that the partial fraction decomposition will take on the form

\[\frac{19x^2-x+4}{x(1+4x^2)} = \frac{A}{x}+\frac{Bx+C}{1+4x^2}\]

Multiplying both sides by the common denominator yields

\[19x^2-x+4 = A(1+4x^2) + (Bx+C)x\]

We now simplify the right hand side and group like terms to get

\[19x^2-x+4 = (4A+B)x^2+Cx+A\]

If we now compare the coefficients of both sides, we have the following system of equations:

\[\left\{\begin{aligned} 4A + B &= 19 \\ C &= -1 \\ A &= 4 \end{aligned}\right.\]

Luckily for us, we already have two of the solutions, so it follows now that $4(4)+B = 19 \implies B=3$. Therefore, we now see that

\[\frac{19x^2-x+4}{x(1+4x^2)} = \frac{4}{x} + \frac{3x-1}{1+4x^2}\]

Hence, we now see that

\[\int \frac{19x^2-x+4}{x(1+4x^2)}\,dx = \int\frac{4}{x}\,dx + \int\frac{3x-1}{1+4x^2}\,dx = \color{red}{\int\frac{4}{x}\,dx} + \color{blue}{\int\frac{3x}{1+4x^2}\,dx} - \color{green}{\int\frac{1}{1+4x^2}\,dx}\]

The first integral is rather straightforward; you should see that

\[\int\frac{4}{x}\,dx = \color{red}{4\ln|x|+C}\]

Next, for the second integral, we make a substitution: $u=1+4x^2\implies \,du =8x\,dx \implies \dfrac{du}{8}=x\,dx$. Thus,

\[\int\frac{3x}{1+4x^2}\,dx = \frac{3}{8}\int\frac{1}{u}\,du = \frac{3}{8}\ln|u|+C = \color{blue}{\frac{3}{8}\ln(1+4x^2)+C}\]

(Note here that we can drop absolute values since $1+4x^2>0$ for any $x$.)

For the last integral, we need to note that

\[\int\frac{1}{1+4x^2}\,dx = \int\frac{1}{1+(2x)^2}\,dx\]

To integrate, we make the substitution $u=2x\implies \,du = 2\,dx \implies \dfrac{du}{2}=\,dx$. Thus,

\[\int\frac{1}{1+4x^2}\,dx = \frac{1}{2}\int\frac{1}{1+u^2}\,du = \frac{1}{2}\arctan(u)+C = \color{green}{\frac{1}{2}\arctan(2x)+C}\]

Therefore, putting everything together, we have that

\[\int\frac{19x^2-x+4}{x(1+4x^2)}\,dx = 4\ln|x| + \frac{3}{8}\ln(1+4x^2) - \frac{1}{2}\arctan(2x) + C\]

I hope this makes sense!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top