Clairaut's theorem and smooth functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Clairaut's theorem asserts that if a function f is of class C^k on an open set S, then the mixed partial derivatives are equal when the indices are reordered. This holds true for k = 2, confirming that Clairaut's theorem is indeed a special case. The existence of derivatives in the nxn Hessian matrix indicates that second partial derivatives exist but does not guarantee their equality unless local continuity is established. The discussion highlights the distinction between generalization and corollary in the context of mathematical theorems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of C^k functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with mixed partial derivatives
  • Knowledge of Hessian matrices and their significance in calculus
  • Basic concepts of mathematical theorems and their classifications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Clairaut's theorem in advanced calculus
  • Explore the properties of C^k functions in detail
  • Learn about Hessian matrices and their applications in optimization
  • Investigate the differences between generalizations and corollaries in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, advanced calculus learners, and researchers interested in the properties of smooth functions and their derivatives.

Simfish
Gold Member
Messages
811
Reaction score
2
Hello
So, my advanced calculus book (Folland) has this theorem...
If f is of class [tex]C^k[/tex] on an open set S, then...

[tex]\partial i_1 \partial i_2 ... \partial i_k f = \partial j_1 \partial j_2 \partial j_k f[/tex] on an open set S whenever the sequence [tex]{j_1 ,..., j_k}[/tex] is a reordering of the sequence [tex]{i_1 ,..., i_k}[/tex], which defines a smooth function when [tex]k = \infty[/tex]

So my question is, is Clairaut's Theorem a special case of this? (when k = 2?). Also, is the existence of derivatives in the nxn Hessian matrix logically equivalent to the conclusion of Clairaut's Theorem? Does this theorem even have a name? (I can't find it on Wikipedia or Mathworld anywhere).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can see Clairaut as a special case but if you look at the proof of the theorem you stated, I suspect that it begins by proving Clairaut and then shows how your thm is a direct generalization (corollary) of it.

For your second question, I'm not sure I understand what you're asking, but if the Hessian matrix is well defined, it only means that the second partial derivatives all exist. It does not say anything about their being equal when they are locally continuous.
 
generalization and corollary aren't the same thing, quasar.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K