Clarification on key concepts of string theory

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on clarifying a statement made by Dr. David Tong regarding string theory's mathematical connections to the equations of relativity and mechanics. The original poster seeks to understand if these equations stem from a common algebraic foundation or if they relate more closely to concepts like the fluid dynamics-gravitation correspondence. There is an acknowledgment of limited mathematical knowledge and a recognition that Dr. Tong's lecture was aimed at a general audience, potentially oversimplifying complex ideas. The conversation also references recent developments in mathematics, such as Monstrous Moonshine, which may be relevant to the discussion. Overall, the inquiry highlights the intricate relationship between advanced theoretical physics and its mathematical underpinnings.
Teichii492
Messages
19
Reaction score
10
I've been tasked with giving a presentation on any subject i like to my undergraduate physics class.
Inspired by a recent lecture i attended by David Tong i have chosen to do a quick (10 minute) overview of the current state of theories beyond the standard model, obviously aimed at being understandable by the group.

I was looking for clarification of something that Dr. Tong said (this is not an exact quote):

"A very peculiar aspect of string theory is that there are aspects of the mathematics involved that can lead you to all the equations of relativity and mechanics"

I was under the impression that he meant that they could come from the same algebraic root, unless this is similar to the fluid dynamics- gravitation correspondance where the equations of relativity with a negative cosmological constant reduce to the relativistic generalisations of the navier-stokes equations.(source)

I'll insert a caveat here in that my knowledge of the mathematics involved is limited at the moment and that i could be mistaken about the fluidics-gravitation correspondance and its significance and that Dr. Tongs lecture was obviously aimed at the semi-layman so his quote may not be entirely representative of what actually happens mathematically.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K