Clarifying the Misconception: Do Positrons Really Travel Backward in Time?

Click For Summary
Positrons are often misinterpreted as traveling backward in time, a notion stemming from Feynman and Wheeler's interpretations. However, the Dirac equation indicates that both positrons and electrons travel forward in time. The discussion clarifies that the idea of positrons as time-traveling electrons is a misconception. The electron-positron collision diagram does not imply time travel but rather illustrates particle interactions in a forward temporal context. Understanding this distinction is crucial for accurate interpretations in particle physics.
stevenytc
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
[URL]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/ba/Feynman_EP_Annihilation.svg[/URL]

this is a standard electron-positron collision. but if positrons can be interpreted as electrons going backward in time (as suggested by Feynman and Wheeler), then can this diagram be interpreted as the electron, originally moving forward in time, releases 2 photons and go backward in time. or, in other words, it "time travels" to the past?

hmm... have i missed out something?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You often see it stated that positrons travel backwards in time, but it's a misinterpretation. The fact is, the Dirac equation describes two different types of particles, positrons and electrons, and they both travel forward in time!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K