What Angles Allow a Football to Clear the Goalpost?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loppyfoot
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the angles of elevation required for a football kicker to successfully clear a goalpost 54 meters away with a height of 3.37 meters, given an initial speed of 27 m/s. The participants utilize kinematic equations, specifically the range formula and projectile motion equations, to derive the largest and smallest angles of elevation. The largest angle calculated is approximately 58 degrees, while the smaller angle is determined through the relationship between horizontal distance and time of flight. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the equations of motion to solve for the angles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations in projectile motion
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions, specifically sine and cosine
  • Knowledge of the concepts of range and maximum height in projectile motion
  • Ability to manipulate equations to isolate variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to derive the range formula for projectile motion
  • Study the relationship between angle of elevation and projectile trajectory
  • Explore the use of quadratic equations in solving for angles in projectile motion
  • Investigate the effects of varying initial velocities on the angles required to clear obstacles
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on kinematics and projectile motion, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to angles of elevation in sports contexts.

Loppyfoot
Messages
192
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A football kicker can give the ball an initial speed of 27 m/s. He is 54 m from the goalpost which has a crossbar 3.37 m high.
(a) What is the largest angle of elevation that he can kick the football and score a field goal?


(b) What is the smaller angle of elevation that he can kick the football and score a field goal?

Homework Equations


rf=r0 + vdeltat
rf=ri+volt+1/2at^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm confused about where to begin this problem ,considering that I don't have time.
Would I do something like:
rf-ri= 27sintheta, but then I would need the change in time, which is not given.

Any thoughts on how to solve this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Next time posting a new topic please include name of topic of question in title, like for this one its kinematics.

For smallest angle you can see that range = 54. so just simply put them in the formula of range. pleas tell me of you don't know.an for largest angle, when y coordinate is 3.37 during flight, x coordinate should be 54.
Hope it helps.
 
hmm. I'm still confused.

Would I do

54= 27sin(theta)*deltat + .5(-9.8)deltat

and then solve for theta?
 
use these eqn

Range = (u2sin2θ)/g
Max height = (u2sin2θ)/2g
Time of flight = (2u sinθ)/g

also at any point,

y = xtanθ - gx2/(2u2 cos2θ)
 
if you need proof for these please refer your book or internet. ask me if you can't find the link
 
u stands for velocity, correct?

and how do I differentiate between the largeer and smaller angles?
 
Last edited:
u is initial velocity
Loppyfoot said:
and how do I differentiate between the largeer and smaller angles?
and use the forth eqn i gave you, for max theta when y is 3.37 .. x must be?
 
my answers don't seem to be working.

I get for the largest angle possible:

54= 27^2sin(theta)^2/ (9.8) = .8520=sintheta= 58 degrees. would that be correct for the larger angle?
 
Loppyfoot said:
54= 27sin(theta)*deltat + .5(-9.8)deltat

This is a wrong eqn, when you used d=54 ... i.e. x distance, a=0 as there is no acc. in x axin

2 eqn you might get are:

54 = ucosθ Δt
and
3.37 = usinθΔt + 0.5a(Δt)2
 
  • #10
Loppyfoot said:
my answers don't seem to be working.

I get for the largest angle possible:

54= 27^2sin(theta)^2/ (9.8) = .8520=sintheta= 58 degrees. would that be correct for the larger angle?

its sin2θ not sin2θ

and sin2θ and sinθ2 are different
 
  • #11
cupid.callin said:
This is a wrong eqn, when you used d=54 ... i.e. x distance, a=0 as there is no acc. in x axin

2 eqn you might get are:

54 = ucosθ Δt
and
3.37 = usinθΔt + 0.5a(Δt)2

Because the problem does not supply deltat, where should that number come from?

54m/27m/s= 2s?
 
  • #12
this way you would find smaller angle ... just imagine yourself to be the kicker,
would higher angle be when ball just reaches the post or when it strikes the top of post?

Now tell me how to find the higher angle?
 
  • #13
cupid.callin said:
54 = ucosθ Δt
and
3.37 = usinθΔt + 0.5a(Δt)2

you have these two eqn's
and θ, Δt are are unknonw

can you work out a way to find any1 of those?
 
  • #14
the higher angle would be when the ball strikes the top of the post.
 
  • #15
I attempted to solve for deltat, but when I plugged delta t from the 2nd equation into the first equation i get a long equation with costheta- costhetasintheta.

I'm confused
 
  • #16
yes ...

now just consider the ball during its motion ... the point where x becomes 54 apply the condition that y=3.37

use my eqn or general method and you can solve for θ
 
  • #17
I don't see what you're getting at. I know there are these two equations, I need to solve a variable deltat to get one variable left. After I try to do that step, I get a ridiculous equation that I need to solve for theta.

Is there any other process of doing this problem?
 
  • #18
do it the other way ...

use eqn one to find Δt in terms of θ
substitute that in eqn 2
and solve.

always substitute smaller eqn into larger one
 
  • #19
wait i'll try to solve
 
  • #20
Ok i'll, as well.
 
  • #21
hmm. what did you come out with?
 
  • #22
i didnt thought of it but seriously this one is damn irritating.

cant get sinθ out so as to solve cosθ
 
  • #23
Are there any sin and cosine laws that would help, like the square of sin added to the square of cosine equalling one?
 
  • #24
well there is ...

sinθ = sqrt(1-cos2θ)
 
  • #25
You could square both sides, and then we can work it out from there?
 
  • #26
well if you square, you can only substitute for sin2θ or cos2θ

well still end up getting something involving sin2θ and sinθ and cosθ
or cos2θ and cosθ and sinθ
 
  • #27
wish i had attended my trigo classes
 
  • #28
You have Vi = 27, Vix = 27cos\theta[/tex] and Viy = 27sin\theta[/tex].<br /> <br /> But keeping all your equations in terms of Vix will result in a quadratic in the form of<br /> <br /> a {V_{ix}}^4 + b {V_{ix}}^2 + c = 0<br /> <br /> Once you solve for Vix (which will have 2 answers), you can determine the 2 angles.
 
  • #29
Say you had a similar problem but you didn't know the initial velocity. Instead you know that you kick the football at 53 degrees, how do you go about finding out what your minimum initial velocity has to be to clear a 10 foot post 36 feet away?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K