Classical and quantum interpretations of electromagnetic radiation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between classical electromagnetic (EM) theory and quantum interpretations of electromagnetic radiation, particularly in the context of radio waves. Participants emphasize that classical EM, governed by Maxwell's equations, suffices for understanding radio wave transmission without delving into quantum mechanics. The frequency of photons is linked to energy via the equation E = hf, but its interpretation in terms of oscillations within a photon is deemed unnecessary and overly complex. Instead, the focus should remain on the frequency of EM waves, which determines radio station channels and modulation methods.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations in classical electromagnetism
  • Familiarity with the concept of frequency in wave phenomena
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics, particularly the relationship between energy and frequency (E = hf)
  • Awareness of radio wave modulation techniques (AM and FM)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Maxwell's equations for a deeper understanding of classical EM waves
  • Explore the concept of coherent states in quantum mechanics
  • Research the principles of radio wave modulation techniques, including AM and FM
  • Investigate the differences between classical and quantum descriptions of electromagnetic radiation
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, radio engineers, and anyone interested in the interplay between classical and quantum theories of electromagnetic radiation.

Glenn G
Messages
113
Reaction score
12
Hi,
So I can get the idea that the ac current in a radio transmitter produces radio waves of the same frequency of the ac supply, just like shaking a slinky sprung up and down but how does this translate into the radio waves as actually coming out as photons and for that matter other than knowing E = hf (so frequency is linked to photon energy is there any way of thinking about what frequency is in this context? Is it oscillations of the electric field within the photon itself. I've heard that thinking of the photon as a little wavelet i.e. Portion of a longer classical wave isn't useful)

Thanks for any guidance,
G.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need quantum mechanics to understand radio waves. Classical EM is perfectly valid for that.
 
Hi Dale,
Thanks, I just wondered how to resolve what happens though through a quantum model, What does it mean to define a frequency for a photon other than just E/h does it represent anything?
 
Glenn G said:
What does it mean to define a frequency for a photon other than just E/h does it represent anything?

It does. We use the word radio for low frequencies, then microwave, infrared, visible light, and x-rays for photons of increasing frequency.

Edit: Also within the radio band, the frequency of the photons corresponds to the channel on the radio. For example, dial your radio to 90.7 Mhz or 107.9 Mhz.
 
Last edited:
Thanks anorlunda,
What is your understanding of the concept of frequency with photons, is it just an expression that equals E/h or do you think it actually represents the number of oscillations of an electric field within the photon per second?
 
Photons are eigenstates of a Fock space. As such they are not energy eigenstates. So a definite number of photons does not have a definite amount of energy nor a definite frequency. The states produced by a RF antenna are probably better approximated by a coherent state than either a Fock or an energy eigenstate.

It is all a useless exercise in unnecessarily complicating an already complicated phenomenon. Just stick with Maxwell's equations for radio waves.
 
Take @Dale 's advice. It is not helpful to think of photons with regard to radios.

Think of EM waves instead. The frequency of the wave determines the radio station. Modulation of the wave (AM or FM) determines the audio signals sent. The power of the radio station determines the strength of those waves. Trying to think of those things one photon at a time just leads you down a big hole of confusion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
23K