I Classical/empirical potential for electron-ion interactions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the search for an empirical potential that describes electron-ion interactions, distinct from the Coulomb potential, particularly in the context of valence electrons. Participants highlight the need for a potential that captures the shielding effect of the nucleus and prevents valence electrons from "hitting" the nucleus, emphasizing that quantum mechanics describes electron behavior rather than classical mechanics. The conversation touches on the limitations of classical models and the historical context of atomic physics leading to quantum mechanics. Mean field theories like Hartree-Fock are mentioned as potential approaches, but there is a clear preference for classical mechanics solutions. Ultimately, the quest for a suitable empirical potential remains unresolved.
feynman1
Messages
435
Reaction score
29
LJ potential is an empirical potential function used between 2 neutral atoms. Is there any classical/empirical potential for electron-ion interactions as well? Different from Coulomb potential, this one if any should be able to capture the mechanism of a valence electron leaving an atom and of preventing a valence electron from hitting a nucleus.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This should simply be the shielded potential of the nucleus, as the electron is unbound and the direct potential term will dominate.
 
  • Like
Likes feynman1
Thanks. How is shielded potential of the nucleus expressed?
 
feynman1 said:
Thanks. How is shielded potential of the nucleus expressed?
Why should the electron be prevented from "hitting" the nucleus?
 
nasu said:
Why should the electron be prevented from "hitting" the nucleus?
A valence one can at most stay on the outermost layer let alone hitting the centre.
 
feynman1 said:
A valence one can at most stay on the outermost layer let alone hitting the centre.
Have you ever seen an image of probability distribution for s-type orbitals? Electrons in atoms are described by quantum mechanics. They don't sit on layers like books in the library.
 
nasu said:
Have you ever seen an image of probability distribution for s-type orbitals? Electrons in atoms are described by quantum mechanics. They don't sit on layers like books in the library.
Yes. Any emperical potential (well) able to describe such s type 'bonding' between an electron and ion?
 
mfb said:
Thanks but I didn't find any help from there talking about any potential function
 
  • #10
feynman1 said:
Yes. Any emperical potential (well) able to describe such s type 'bonding' between an electron and ion?
These are obtained by solving Schroedinger equation with Coulomb potential. Is done (for hydrogen atom) in introductory QM courses.
 
  • #11
nasu said:
These are obtained by solving Schroedinger equation with Coulomb potential. Is done (for hydrogen atom) in introductory QM courses.
OK, I actually was looking for a potential that works in classical mechanics, namely some potential+'F=ma'
 
  • #12
feynman1 said:
You do understand that it wasa atomic OK, I actually was looking for a potential that works in classical mechanics, namely some potential+'F=ma'
God luck with that...
You do understand that it was problems with atomic physics that precipitated the invention of Quantum Mechanics? The best you can do is some sort of mean firld theory (which is Hartree-Fock as I recall)
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and vanhees71
  • #13
hutchphd said:
God luck with that...
You do understand that it was problems with atomic physics that precipitated the invention of Quantum Mechanics? The best you can do is some sort of mean firld theory (which is Hartree-Fock as I recall)
Yes I knew thanks. Wasn't looking for any precise QM theory.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
Back
Top