Classical mechanics with rational coordinates instead of real

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Shing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euclidean Space
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
Shing
Messages
141
Reaction score
1
Classical Mechanics define our space is [itex]E^3[/itex]
that's also assumed to be [itex]R^3[/itex]x [itex]R_t[/itex]
I just wondering what if [itex]Q^3[/itex]x [itex]Q_t[/itex]?
will it make any significant difference? will it cause any logical paradox?

thanks for reading!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing I wonder about is how a particle in one dimension will get from coordinate a to coordinate b. In my mind, it should always do so in a continuous fashion. But you suppose it would "hop" from one rational to the "next"? You would solve Newton's laws (like F = m x'') in an interval with "holes" (e.g. [itex][a, b] \cap \mathbb{Q}[/itex])?