Classification of Areas of Physics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the lack of a comprehensive classification system for physics akin to the ICM program for mathematics. Participants highlight the American Physical Society's Topical Groups as a valuable resource for understanding the breadth of physics research areas. Additionally, The Physics Teacher publication from the American Association of Physics Teachers is recommended for its diverse articles on various physics topics. Overall, while no single classification exists, these resources provide insight into the relative importance and size of different physics areas.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with the ICM program and its classification of mathematical topics.
  • Understanding of the American Physical Society and its Topical Groups.
  • Knowledge of the American Association of Physics Teachers and its publications.
  • Basic concepts in physics research areas and their significance.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the American Physical Society's Topical Groups for detailed insights into various physics research areas.
  • Read articles from The Physics Teacher to gain a broader understanding of current topics in physics education.
  • Investigate other classification systems or resources in physics to compare with the ICM program.
  • Research the significance of different physics subfields and their impact on scientific advancements.
USEFUL FOR

Physics researchers, educators, and students seeking to understand the classification and significance of various areas within the field of physics.

Unknot
Messages
117
Reaction score
2
Hello physics people.

I love looking at the ICM program (http://www.mathunion.org/activities/icm/icm-2010-program-structure/) because I think it's the best classification system for mathematics out there. There are pretty much all the popular research topics listed and it is hard to argue against the number of lectures for each category (of course, based on how "big" the area is). No matter how interesting euclidean geometry is, it's not there, because it is not taken very seriously (no offense to euclidean geometers :smile:)

I am wondering if there is something similar to that in physics. Something that suggests sizes of different areas, divided up nicely.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there! Welcome to the physics forum.

The ICM program is indeed quite comprehensive and provides good insight into the relative importance of different areas of mathematics. Unfortunately, there isn't a similar program or classification system for physics that I'm aware of. However, there are some other resources that you can use to get a sense of the size and breadth of different areas in physics. For example, the American Physical Society publishes their list of Topical Groups which outlines the various research groups within the society and provide an overview of the various topics they cover. You can also look at the American Association of Physics Teachers publication, The Physics Teacher, which contains articles on a wide range of topics in physics.

Hope this helps and good luck in your research!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K