Clausius-Clapeyron equation and absorbed heat

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
MaxLinus
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Work out the Clausius-Clapeyron equation using the efficiency of a Carnot cycle.
Relevant Equations
Clausius-Clapeyron equation; Carnot efficiency
In working out the Clausius-Clapeyron equation in an elementary method, we usually consider the work done in a Carnot cycle, built with two isothermobarics at ##p## , ##T## and ##p- dp##,##T-dT## pressures and temperatures and two adiabatics, as ##\mathcal{L} = dp(V_g - V_\ell)##, where ##V_g## is the volume of ##n## vaporized moles and ##V_\ell## is their volume in the liquid phase. The heat absorbed in the isothermobaric vaporization is usually set to ##Q_a = n \lambda##, where ##\lambda## is the molar latent heat of vaporization. So the efficiency is ##\eta =\frac{\mathcal{L}}{Q_a} = \frac{dp(V_g - V_\ell)} {n \lambda}##. Then the solution is easy: the efficiency must be equal to ##dT/T## (Carnot cycle), and you get
$$ \frac{dp}{dT} = \frac{n \lambda}{T(V_g - V_\ell)} $$But why the work ##\mathcal{L}_1 = p (V_g - V_\ell)## done in the isothermobaric expansion is not considered in the balance? The heat absorbed should account for vaporization and for expansion, whose effect appears not so easily neglibile: latent heat of water is about ##2 \, MJ/kg##, while an expansion of ##V_g - V_\ell = 1 \, m^3## (not an exaggerated value) at atmospheric pressure (##\sim 100 \, kPa ##) should contribute with approximately ##100 \, kJ \sim 0.1 \, MJ##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MaxLinus said:
The heat absorbed should account for vaporization and for expansion
If I'm understanding it correctly, the definition of heat of vaporization does include the expansion work ##p(V_g-V_l)##. For example, see the definitions here and here.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MaxLinus
Ok. The first link you posted states it very clearly.
Many thanks.
 
Back again, just a bit.
In first problems about calorimetry, we usually do not deal with volumes, but only with moles and masses. Yet, vaporization takes place at a definite pressure. So, if I understand correctly your hint, we can still define a work in the expansion even if it occurs (for example) in an open vessel, but in an environment with pressure. Something related to partial volumes ...