Cleaning up radioactive or mine waste

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges and implications of cleaning up radioactive or mine waste, particularly in the context of rare Earth element mining and its environmental impact. Participants explore the relationship between nuclear energy, alternative energy sources, and the environmental consequences of mining practices.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern about the long-term consequences of radioactive waste and the hope for future generations to find solutions.
  • There is a claim that typical photovoltaic (PV) panels primarily use silicon, not rare Earth elements, which are more relevant for specialized applications.
  • Participants discuss the environmental impact of mining practices, particularly in China, and question the effectiveness of regulations in mitigating damage.
  • One participant shares personal experience with rare Earth elements and highlights the strategic concerns regarding their supply, particularly from China.
  • There is a comparison made between the challenges of managing radioactive waste from mining and those associated with nuclear waste management.
  • Some argue that the economic factors, such as pricing and market dynamics, influence the feasibility of cleanup efforts for radioactive materials.
  • A suggestion is made that a tax on uranium mining could incentivize better waste management practices.
  • Participants note that the ongoing issues related to radiation leakage from the Fukushima site are relevant but suggest that the topic may be better suited for a different forum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the environmental impact of mining rare Earth elements and the effectiveness of current regulations. There is no consensus on the best approach to managing radioactive waste, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of mining practices and nuclear energy.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the lack of coherent solutions for dealing with radioactive residues from mining, while others point out the complexities of environmental regulations and the socio-political context in China. The discussion touches on the broader implications of nuclear energy and waste management without reaching definitive conclusions.

jadair1
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
I would hope it is not unsolvable but I know I will be dead long before this mess is cleaned up and I hope that it is resolved in my grandchildren's generation. They are in their twenties now and have children of their own.

All of us anti nuke people talk about solar power and other alternative energy sources but disregard the damage done to mine the rare Earth elements needed to build them.

I have no idea what the solution is but I know we are on a horrible path.

[Moderator note: Threads were spun off from the Japan Earthquake: nuclear plants part 2]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
jadair1 said:
All of us anti nuke people talk about solar power and other alternative energy sources but disregard the damage done to mine the rare Earth elements needed to build them.

(1) Typical PV panels don't use rare Earth elements. They use silicon. Rare Earth's go into small volume, very expensive and very efficient panels, mostly geared for spacecraft .

(2) Mining can be done different ways. If regulations are in place (e.g. air pollution, effluent control...) and enforced, mining is not significantly damaging.

I have no idea what the solution is but I know we are on a horrible path.

You like to feel scared and/or guilty?
 
nikkkom said:
(1) Typical PV panels don't use rare Earth elements. They use silicon. Rare Earth's go into small volume, very expensive and very efficient panels, mostly geared for spacecraft .

(2) Mining can be done different ways. If regulations are in place (e.g. air pollution, effluent control...) and enforced, mining is not significantly damaging.
You like to feel scared and/or guilty?

I am neither scared nor feeling guilty. I died after having an operation for having cancerous tumors removed from my mouth in 2008, fortunately I was in the hospital at the time and they brought me back. Everything since then is bonus time!

I know a thing or two about rare Earth elements and their uses, years ago I was heavily invested in the mining sector, mainly gold and copper mines but I was looking to get into rare Earth projects in North and South America so I researched the field extensively.

Most of the rare Earth elements at the time came from China and it was of great concern to industry in the west as China was cutting back exports every year as their needs were increasing. Also for strategic reasons.

The amount that goes into space is miniscule compared to that used in terrestrial electronics. Now having said that I still oppose Nuclear Energy ever since Fukushima blew up and I was once a staunch supporter.

You are correct however that little REE are used in the construction of the panels but the associated electronics and controls would use them.

Here is an interesting link if you are interested. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare_earth_element#Environmental_considerations
 
jadair1 said:
You are correct however that little REE are used in the construction of the panels but the associated electronics and controls would use them.

Here is an interesting link if you are interested. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare_earth_element#Environmental_considerations

I read it, and saw nothing unexpected there. It says the mining of REs produces mildly radioactive tailings with some thorium. This is not unique by a long shot. For example, mining of phosphates often produces uranium-enriched tailings. Because of this, there are environmental laws on mining, requiring mining company to treat its waste streams, rendering them safe.
 
Did you not read how environmentally unsafe the mining practices in China are for the illegal mines and standards largely ignored by the larger ones. Never mind this is getting way to off topic for this forum.
 
Actually, this is very much on topic.
The mining of rare Earth's, much like phosphate rock processing, mobilizes a large volume of radioactive residue material.
Nobody has any coherent way to deal with this and the price of the end product is too low to pay for reasonable remediation.
It sure reminds me of nuclear spent fuel and waste management, the cost of fixing it properly is daunting, so we ignore the problem, but eventually it forces itself onto center stage.
The Chinese let the market fix the problem by imposing an export quota, which hugely raised the price. That made a cleanup affordable. Although the suppliers probably find it cheaper to bribe the local officials than to remedy the situation, at least the economic prerequisites are now met.
A huge tax on uranium mining would probably do wonders for fuel reprocessing and nuclear waste management.
 
Bandit127 said:
Sorry etudiant but I cannot see how this is on topic for a thread entitled "Japan Earthquake: nuclear plants".

The subject is worthy of discussion in the wider Nuclear Engineering forum - perhaps you can start a new thread?
You make a good point, although to all appearances the ongoing lower level radiation leakage from the Fukushima site is a major issue.
Cleaning up a large area of contamination is a missing skill in the nuclear world, as Fukushima among others illustrates, but better handled in a new thread as you suggest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jadair1 said:
Did you not read how environmentally unsafe the mining practices in China are for the illegal mines and standards largely ignored by the larger ones

This is not a problem of mining REs per se. It is a problem of Chinese people lacking ways to affect their government and improve their laws. Discussing *that* problem would be off-topic here.
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 763 ·
26
Replies
763
Views
280K
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
14K
Replies
64
Views
18K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
12K