Clear and thorough development of the step potential wave function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges faced by a reader of Shankar's "Principles of Quantum Mechanics," particularly regarding the step potential problem and its derivation using Schrödinger's equation. The reader finds Shankar's explanation lacking in clarity and detail, making it difficult to grasp the concept of quantum tunneling. Recommendations for clearer resources include G. Baym's "Lectures on Quantum Mechanics," specifically pages 88 onwards, which is noted for its thoroughness. The reader also inquires about the use of bra-ket notation in Baym's text and compares it to other recommended texts like Griffiths and Sakurai.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Schrödinger's equation
  • Familiarity with quantum tunneling concepts
  • Knowledge of Gaussian wave packets
  • Basic grasp of bra-ket notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study G. Baym's "Lectures on Quantum Mechanics" for a clearer derivation of the step potential
  • Explore Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" for alternative explanations
  • Review Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics" for advanced insights
  • Investigate additional resources on quantum tunneling phenomena
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in quantum mechanics, particularly those struggling with the step potential problem and seeking clearer instructional materials.

andrewkirk
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
4,140
Reaction score
1,741
I am reading Shankar's "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" and am up to the part where he uses Schrödinger's equation to derive the wave function for various 'simple' scenarios in one spatial dimension.

The first few were fine but his presentation of the step potential problem (specifically, the time evolution of a Gaussian wave packet encountering a step potential) is appalling. It's as though he dashed it off in a hurry one morning when he was late for his train to work. It leaves huge gaps, doesn't explain the steps, uses undefined terms and unintroduced concepts, to the extent that I find parts of it completely impenetrable.

This is a great pity as the step potential problem appears to explain how the amazing phenomenon of quantum tunnelling can occur, and I was really looking forward to understanding that.

Can anybody direct me to a derivation of the wave function for a step potential that is both clear and thorough?

Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You may check G. Baym's presentation in his <Lectures on Quantum Mechanics>, pp. 88 onwards.
 
Thanks for that recommendation. The lectures appear to only be available by purchasing the book, which would take several weeks as it seems to be hard to get, although Amazon's site says it currently has it. Apparently a few years ago it could only be obtained second-hand.

Would you recommend Baym's text generally as a good introductory text on QM? If so, I'll buy it anyway. I have been wondering about getting one or both of the other texts that are sometimes recommended - Griffiths and Sakurai - but opinions seem sharply divided as to their merits. Maybe Baym is the solution.

Does Baym use bra-ket notation? Having invested in understanding that in the first 100 pages of Shankar, I'd prefer to stick with it if possible.

[What I'd really like to buy is the boxed set of Feynman's lectures, but Amazon won't sell them to anybody outside the USA.]

Thanks again
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K