Closed ended tube resonance problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a resonance problem involving a 3 m long aluminum bar, which is clamped at a node, and the frequency of 1200 Hz that is produced. Participants are exploring the relationship between the length of the bar, the wavelength, and the velocity of sound in the material.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the wavelength and velocity using the given frequency and length. Some participants question the assumptions regarding the boundary conditions (node vs. antinode) and suggest re-evaluating the expression for length in relation to wavelength.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct interpretation of the boundary conditions for the aluminum bar. Some participants have provided feedback on the calculations, noting that the resulting velocity appears high for aluminum, which may indicate a need for further examination of the assumptions made.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the bar being clamped at a node and the resulting implications for the type of tube (open or closed) being modeled. There is also a mention of the velocity values being potentially unrealistic based on known properties of aluminum.

AbsoluteZer0
Messages
124
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



In class a 3 m long aluminum bar was made to resonate by clamping it at a node in the centre of the bar. The frequency heard was 1200Hz.


Homework Equations



L = \frac{n}{4}\lambda

v = f\lambda

The Attempt at a Solution



Knowing that L is 3, we can substitute this into the formula and solve accordingly in order to find wavelength:

3 = \frac{1}{4}\lambda
(4)(3) = \lambda

Which gives us 12m. We can then use the wave equation, substituting 12 and 1200

v = f\lambda
v =(1200)(12)

to arrive at 14400 m s^-1

However, I am lead to believe that I am possibly wrong due to the relatively high value of velocity that I found. Am I wrong? If so, where is my mistake?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What must be at each end of the rod - a node or an antinode? Rethink the expression for ##L## in terms of ##\lambda##.
 
TSny said:
What must be at each end of the rod - a node or an antinode? Rethink the expression for ##L## in terms of ##\lambda##.

I believe an antinode at each end, making it an open ended tube.

L = \frac{n}{2}\lambda

L is therefore 6 m, and velocity is therefore 7200 m s-1

Is this correct?

Thanks,
 
Yes, that looks right to me. (According to a quick check on the internet, 7200 m/s is somewhat high for aluminum. But that's what your data gives.)
 
Thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K